Member Info for Richob

Of course a cohort 5 is possible.

As is the next phase.

As are both together.

I don't see any of those three outcomes as negative in a clinical trial but perhaps I am deluded.

Onwards Avacta Group.

No worries.

It is excellent news for AVA6000.

Just leaves MSC therapies and The Diagnostics Division to move forward to mention just two.

Onwards Avacta Group.

So what "crap" did RAH post?

Please have your spat somewhere else.

How can it not be positive that a fifth site is now recruiting?

Onwards Avacta Group.

Gene therapy is certainly one area to watch going forward, Hurst.

The investors in the last Affyxell funding round were:

Avacta Group
Shinhan Venture
Kolon Venture
Samsung Venture
Stonebridge Ventures
Gyeongnam Venture
Smilegate Inv

I see that Stonebridge set milestone targets for putting in further investment:

https://www.stonebridge.co.kr/venture-capital

Doesn't look like there would be a shortage of suitors for an IPO.

Onwards Avacta Group.

How do we become an insider, Timster?

Asking for me and not a friend. Lol.

Keep smiling.

Onwards Avacta Group.

Is Captain Gains Tax linked to Private Enterprise or Corporal Punishment?

Have a nice day, all.

Congratulations on your 40 plus tick ups.

As Wyndrum and myself could only muster 4 (lol and quel surprise) I will leave it alone whilst retaining my own understanding of supply and demand.

All the best.

Pahoo,

The Bus Company has had a record year and may well do an IPO during Q4 as most of the free cash was used to buy The Shetland Bus Company, now a subsidiary of The Bus Company Group.

Cheers.

HL haven't returned funds yet, polo.

Enjoy your tea, DTW.

Your analogy with Wembley and football tickets is ludicrous (sorry) as it ignores all other football games just as your elastic argument ignores all other shares.

As I said earlier, not worth debating but if you do then please don't post diatribe.

All the best.

Thank you for agreeing, Pahoo.

All the best.

DTW,

If you think that 263 million is "perfectly inelastic" then I happily give up.

I won't bother with "no alternative" as there are obviously no other shares in any other companies
available for people to buy.

All the best.

I'll try, DTW.

'If supply remains constant and demand increases, prices will rise' - we know supply is inelastic, i.e. there are only a finite number of shares available, hence as more people seek to BUY shares then demand increases and the price rises."

So when supply doesn't remain constant (and increases) what happens?

I think Adam Smith covered this by using the word "constant".

Hence I will stick with buyers do force the price down when there are willing sellers and force the price up when there aren't many sellers. They force the price way up when there are no sellers.

I accept that Wyndrum may not have explained it this way exactly but the number/volume of sellers is key to what Adam Smith said.

Probably a waste of time discussing this here do you think?

All the best.

Timster, I think buyers only drive the price down if their are a lot of sellers. When there are few sellers then obviously buyers drive the price up.

Just saying for a friend.

If you type Avacta Group subsidiaries into Google you get a list which I have not heard of before (apart from Animal Health which is now sold).

Can anyone enlighten me on what this means if anything?

Cheers.

HL have got to be the slowest at refunding.

Can't see how Stifel didn't return funds simultaneously.

... Avacta is currently valued at @£290m and the doxorubicin market is valued at $1.38bn per annum.

A slight disconnect on a quiet Sunday.

... I think this is the bit a lot of people are missing:

"Avacta is now a Distributor and can sell their Affimers via their new purchase. The new company already brings £9m profit to our bottom line."

Onwards Avacta Group.

I think what Wyndrum meant was that if there are less sellers then the price rises.

There will be less sellers when their shares have been bought.

Onwards Avacta Group.

It was an example, purple1.