Member Info for Resipsa

today. 58,000 sells v 467,324 buys. Nice tick up after slipping back recently. Some encouraging contract renewals too recently. Onwards and upwards...

I took a small position here last year at IPO, in part due to sentimental reasons which I know isn't a good way to invest, but the product is fantastic. I am surprised though that there hasn't been more interest in this company from II e.g WPCT -aside from Aviva it seems, who hold just over 4%. Especially in the light of the recent distribution agreements being signed, I thought it might be on the radars of some of the micro cap funds? On a positive note, there only appears to be about 32% of the shares in free float so this could rise rapidly on continuing good news. Y/E results are due this Friday...

sain, my reference to the usual suspects is to those people who continually hope that PB fail with the USA venture, not Trustpilot.

I didn't read the interims as negatively as you...glass half full with optimism moving in the right direction. Will continue to hold for now.

Investec has reiterated its buy rating with a target of £4.65

Is it not the reviewers who have posted on the wrong site who are responsible, not PB themselves? I take my hat off to them with this new foray. The negative posts today are from the usual suspects; those that think they will fail - change think to hope. PB time and time again have proved everyone wrong so far...

Do you subscribe to Share Mag dodgepot? There was a good piece in the share spotlight section, the company wrote a self promotion/advert for its services which gave an upbeat message for the future. I think their PR dept need to do more stuff like this to highlight what they do. Huge growth industry. Looking forward with anticipation to interim results on Thursday.

Although it's not for me, I don't have a problem with someone shorting a share, paticularly when they've advanced a rational argument for doing so. What I do find objectionable is when a certain poster over the last few days shows an unabashed delight at a share price fall, which obviously affects LTH. # Slightly unhinged Nice to see the strong finish to the day, I hope the TA/charts are wrong - not that I have any clue what they mean I'm afraid!

the client first. What you do you mean? Like a unicorn?

Cyber, I only mentioned that the SP was on their advice to demonstrate that it wasn't the case that we had asked for it to be marketed at an unrealistic SP and that's why they were suggesting acceptance of the low offer. We know what a realistic value for the area/property should be. Also, this offer was made fairly early on and it was obvious their advice was driven by pure self interest to get a quick sale and the property off their books rather than what was in the best interest of the vendor judged against local market forces. They didn't even provide any reasoned justification for seriously considering the offer. (incidentally that buyer did subsequently make a much improved offer). Without guidance from family, some vendors on their own in this situation might have either felt pressured into acceptance of the first offer based on fear they might not get another offer or that the agent must know better.

She may not have "lost" anything financially but she is tied into a 16 week contract with these muppets which will have cost her the best selling time over the summer months. My post was to provide balance, in response to Sain's suggestion that a good local agent with their ear to the ground can add value to the transaction. A poor agent can have the opposite effect. Milly, you like to suggest that once the PB agent has you signed up and taken your money they don't care if you sell or not; if that were true and PB weren't selling then the public wouldn't be using them... Btw, your fixed fee boast doesn't represent good value on any property under about £120k, which would still apply to the majority in many parts of the Midlands.

A tale of the excellent value that the local agent is adding so far... The mother-in- law is currently selling a property in the Midlands, using a local agent on the High St. Initial property description was incorrect, full of spelling errors which we had to point out, number of bedrooms incorrectly described, so we're off to a flying start. Admittedly there was a flurry of activity in the beginning and some viewings which led to an offer which they tried to persuade her to accept even though £32k under SP; bear in mind the asking is £100k (which was on their advice). Conflict of interest anyone? Total lack of communication since; she learns of viewings via the neighbour, no feedback after viewings and informed of a subsequent offer which then transpired was for a different client's property! No wonder PB are gaining such traction.

Very aptly named. Wrote an almost identical piece beginning of March 2017 when the SP was c£3.50...!

For the 6 months to end of June 2017 will be announced 14th Sept.

What you need to appreciate cyber is that although milly claims not to be worried about PB as serious competition, invariably describing them as a "joke", her posts betray a deep-seated insecurity that they are in reality eating into her business. Hence why she spends a lot of time populating a BB on a share she's not invested in, slandering the company. It's understandable that she's worried.

As a matter of interest, roughly when did you first start offering no sale no fee?

Tend to agree with afrc. Thought contract news would have generated more interest but hardly a murmur.

Only time will tell as to how the Watchdog programme will affect PB's business in the short, or more importantly, long term, but I really do think you are exaggerating its influence. It was basically a few half wits wingeing about their own failure to read a contract properly. The SP hasn't fallen off the cliff as some were predicting last night and has held up well. Certainly the ii's wont be rushing to sell purely based on Watchdog

What a surprise. Milly's popped up and gone into overdrive with her usual "smoke and mirrors" conspiracy theories and slating the owners for selling some shares wanting to bank some profits (I still don't get what's wrong with doing that). You really should make a bit more effort to disguise your hatred of PB because you just come across as a green eyed monster. As for HSEA gloating over the Watchdog coverage and ****ging PB's ethics, it's frankly laughable. To me it's a bit like a pickpocket criticising a shoplifter. The Watchdog piece will be old news in a few weeks and forgotten about. What business doesn't have some disgruntled customers. It's how you deal with the complaint that matters. I thought Bruce came across quite well; I was expecting a polished, smooth operator but he started off a bit nervously, grew in confidence and handled the situation well.

I'm wondering if there's a placing in the offing...? SP has been dropping for several days now on no news that I'm aware of.