RE: Share Price14 May 2018 12:29
09.58: Learningtoinvest - all good points. Icewine 2 followed on from Icewine 1 and, due to proximity of sites, we might assume new well is to benefit from 'profile' of old well. (We could have drilled in another zone to derisk a further area but choice was made). A vertical well design was chosen (much debated on this bb at the time). As we know, in unconventional plays a horizontal system is used (PB out of everyone knew that), so a vertical well signified certain confidences. There was the confidence from Icewine 1 data (in Bex) to go for a vertical design which could determine horizontal landing sites in the HRZ to maximise future oil extraction. However, it is not a design which will make it easy to establish a realistic 'flow rate' (whatever that is) in a multi-zoned environment. Speaking to PB he sounded sure of flow from data from Icewine 1 (Bex) and had planned way ahead so it was not the prime purpose behind Icewine 2 imo. As ever, in the field, other parameters have arisen and we can look forward to the pros and cons of those. VGLA