Troajan6 Jan 2021 07:44
Hey Troajan, costs being too high are indeed a ‘mining dilemma’. Costs are roughly split as follows: 40% mining, 15% milling, 20% SGA , transport mine to mill 10% and 15% TC/RC/ transport
They would have known when they built the mine that transport would cost more than average and factored that into the mine plan. But what they haven’t factored in is the mining downtime which is limiting the available ore.
Everything is set up for 1,250tpd. Ventilation, power, dewatering, hoisting/haulage, milling, transport and associated labour etc etc…significant fixed costs for that planned volume. They should be consistently hitting 95% nameplate or more but I think they hit it in only one quarter in the last 3 years. Once you get the mining right you’ll get the consistent feed at the required quality and you won’t have idle cost, the mill won’t need to turn off due to lack of material (as it has in the past) and you won’t have empty dump trucks. It sounds like the mill could use a refurb as well but that’s been less an issue when they haven't had the ore.
Most likely they underinvested in maintenance over the last few years because of the cash flow problems and now the gear isn’t performing. What they are proposing seems inherently sound to me and why I've been buying. Getting some new equipment and a contractor in to help run it will ensure they consistently move 1,250tpd, which means 7,500tpa copper to start and a profit at the current elevated price. The various planned enhancements and production improvements will mean the mine can make money at lower copper prices too