Member Info for Quady

Good morning Monte, I am unsure, but with Ingo going and the new CFO going in short succession, I would say that things are starting to move.
The one thing I would not say is that this is indicative of a bid. That would be crazy.
We have the PFS, next is the DFS, and we know that this will happen faster because of the way the PFS has been constructed. As one feeds into the other. I would guess that we may be looking at another offtake agreement to get us to DFS and BFS. But also that we may have news on partnership's with some of the other regionals.
Certainly a wake up RNS.

We continue to make the necessary changes required to advance Cascabel.

Correct Talatum we have known that for ages, plus they will not offer full value.
As Solgold have said so often we proceed with plan A.

Right off for a couple of days. Have fun.

SharketMare linkedin is a way of putting yourself out there if you don't have contacts. As soon as I was on the market I had two job offers within 24 hours. If you're professional and you know what you are doing, you don't need linkedin.

Of course I have was 35 years with the same company, my job moved a long way away, I was offered another role nearer, but choose to go. My renumeration was redundancy with conditions, which upped my payment. I retired at the age of 57 and take on the occasional projects if it interests me. Which now days isn't very often.

That's easy to answer seanhunter, it's because that's not the plan. The company has been crystal clear. It's to bring Cascabel and other tenements to production.

Addicknt your correct it was linkedin. Sorry no he shouldn't, when leaving a company in his position, he would have been renumerated for it. When I left my employer as a technical analyst, I was not allowed to apply for any job with the competition for 6 months.
As you repeatedly point out I have never run a company or even being a manager. But I feel Ingo should have least acted in a professional manner.

Woody read what I wrote. I said communication should be official like in any other company.
The fact their has been no communication from the company on Ingo's departure is professional, as we will get an official communication when Solgold know his replacement and the timeline. We will get one, not the unprofessional Ingo tweet.

DBW that's my point, Fawsi according to the people who talk to him, doesn't give out anything we don't have. But the way it's communicated on this forum, is misleading. If you want to share what Faswi says, then don't paraphrase, print it in it's entirety.

DBW, nothing is perfect.
I liked Ingo's input.
But he chose to be unprofessional and go on twitter.
This should have been a proper timed announcement, and may have impacted the current share price in a negative way.
Your correct on drill holes, but let's ask ourselves why that is.
We have investors on here talking to Fawsi, and then reading the RNS's.
Because we only get summaries from the people who talk to Fawsi, we end up with part of the story and trying to map it to official communication from the company.
It is not Solgold that have the communication problems.
It's Fawsi and Ingo who have not made their announcements in line with the company and gone off at a tangent. If Fawsi wants to give Shareholders information, it should come in an official communication.

DBW, communication from Solgold is excellent, the information you are asking for, you can have if you're sitting at the top table.
I am mostly invested in FTSE 100 and 250 companies for dividend income. These are all bigger companies than Solgold. None of them give the level of information that Solgold gives. Yes they give more RNS's, but they contain regulatory information like buybacks or how many shares in issue etc.
Simple question: If you like me believe Solgold can raise the funds and build Alpala, then eventually we get our payday.

If like addicknt you believe no one will lend us the money and we cannot build Alpala then it's a dangerous game, one we eventually lose.

It's that simple.

Addicknt the only person talking nonsense on here is you. When we did the cashbox offer, I said we could, you never even heard of such a thing. Because I couldn't remember that it was called a cashbox offer, you said I didn't know what I was talking about. You said NM would be ousted after the vote. He is still here. The plan was always to replace NM as we proceeded to production, agreed the vote sped things up.
You said after BHP ended it's standstill agreement, that it would all be over by Christmas. ( That was years ago ).
We are taking the steps necessary to become a producer. You say not only we cannot go it alone, but no one will lend us the money. Your about to be proven wrong again for the infinite time. In fact it would be helpful if you could tell this forum about something you got right.

Addicknt, as you know I have been investing for over 40 years now. No company gives the level of detail you think we deserve.
They give us the company direction ( which you ignore ).
They give us RNS's when required ( which you spin ).
Then give us webinars ( which you pretend mean something else).
You constantly are incorrect about all things with Solgold, yet you pretend it's me that doesn't know what I am talking about.
You rewrite history by pretending I have said things that I haven't ( you have said them not me ).
And when Mathersfinger says something that you disagree with, you take a high handed view because your an ex CEO.
For the record, CEO's and directors often don't make good investors. Good investors make good investors.

Agreed Orthern as they are applying for permissions and licenses, but looks like it will commence sooner than we felt.

Hello Ortherncopper, thank you.
Looks like we are about to start drilling again according to 28th July RNS.

Good afternoon Ortherncopper, who was it that said Fawsi told them all drilling was suspended. In Helipuerto Solgold is expediting the delivery of drilling and environmental permits. So looks like we will be drilling with a vengeance soon.

I am confused is Solgold drilling other sites or not.

Kat I don't decide what hateful, ****** or extreme hate.
Those things are defined philosophically, in societical behaviour and by law.
What a really unintelligent post.
If you support this Rac.ist woman hating person, who is mainly on here to spread his extreme message of hate. Then say so, but don't pretend you are an advocate of free speech, because your post shows your not.

Kat you may not notice but many people on here tick up these Rac.ist, women hating posts.
It's not about being black and white.
It's about identifying these hateful people.

Sorry Snuggtopz you either are against racism, hatred of women and far right hate speech, or your for it. Which one are you.