Member Info for Quady

Agreed Mathersfinger I think when the storm calms this will be seen for what it is.
Our two major shareholders are unhappy.
Solgold are running the show.
However would be good to have some meat on the bone about Darryl's departure.

Good morning SharketMare, those situations I believe are different.
Darryl was in charge of the strategic review, so with his departure they will need to clarify if it's still ongoing.
Also they will need to reaffirm the company direction.
We got this communication when Nick stepped down, we need it now.

However I do accept your premise that they are not the quickest at giving updates.
I just feel they cannot leave the market hanging on what has occurred here.

Agreed Ortherncopper.
I think the things we can agree on is he was pushed, as no handover.
Maybe this has something to do with recent events.
The CGP deal or the 0.6% offtake.
I guess we wait and see as Solgold are going to have to clarify the situation sooner rather than later unless we really are going to get the updated PFS for Alpala and the PEA for Porvenir very quickly now.
We have the funding.
What I would like is these updates plus a better defined timeline for the DFS.

All the best.

Good morning Ortherncopper I have more questions than answers this morning.
The CGP deal. What was talked about and committed to?
If we are going to be sold why the offtake agreement for 0.6%, as we had 30 million from the CGP deal as a loan?
This doesn't add up.
A sale makes no sense.
Could we be talking about financing Alpala before a DFS.
I am not sure how that works.
Anyone got an idea how to join the dots and make sense of all the above.
Please if your answer is we are going to be sold don't respond.

What a ridiculous post Jezzoo.
If you say you're not a stirrer, then stop stirring.
It's that simple.

Okay for the first time I am posting with no evidence, but I have a gut feeling.
After all the rubbish spouted this morning saying a sale is imminent.

Try this for size.

This is to do with the 0.6% offtake agreement.
We know our major shareholders were unhappy, just like they were unhappy about the Franco Nevada offtake agreement.

I don't think Darryl supported it that is why he name was not on the RNS.

No conspiracy theories on NM required.
Darryl was at odds with the board.
He may have wanted BHP and NCM to retain their percentage holding.

Now I am not saying I am correct, but this has come out of the blue and this was our last announcement.

Correct Bozi.
As I said noone checks, and you get the likes of Jezzoo who is clueless about everything Solgold trying to have a go at me.

However this is unexpected and interesting what we should be discussing is what is occurring here.
This is difficult with the same people saying we are going to be sold.
If NM had a full English breakfast they would say this is evidence that we are being sold.

Does anyone have anything useful to contribute.

Jezzoo this boards chief stirrer is stirring yet again.
He really doesn't know when to quit.

ColonelDrake post below it clearly says that Darryl will go after the strategic review. He is 100% wrong.

I think Darryl's expertise has been more than useful and Porvenir PEA could be quite exciting - it might even look like a 25% sized version of Alpala but easier to mine with lower Capex and faster ROI. I fully expect Porvenir to follow in foot steps of Lundin's Mirador and deliver production revenue well before Alpala. But that's a story for another company as SOLG will be sold soon. And once the strategic review results has been revealed, I fully expect Darryl to walk or be pushed as he's no longer needed. It becomes a CGP / Mather show there on. And those boys want nothing less than 80p+ imho. We might see two deals, one for Alpala circa 65p and Porvenir/rest of folio for 20p to 25p to Valuestone/lundin group/coldelco etc (the southern folio).

Redknight also reversing his position he said NM was toast when he stepped down as CEO.
Now he is pretending he thinks Mather is in charge.
It's me that has always said NM has influence because of his various holdings totalling near 20%.

Trying to rewrite history.

Almost done He says lots of things depending on wherever he is holding or not.
His November 1st post says Darryl will go after the strategic review has been delivered.
It hasn't been delivered.
So something else is happening here.
He is wrong plain and simple.
Problem is people on here don't check.

Eloro he didn't, read his November 1st post.
I have reported it accurately.
Try reading before sounding off.

We open in a few minutes time, I have this feeling that we are going to close up today.
I just think this so left field, somebody knows what's happening.

I am in agreement with SharketMare, the one thing this indicates is we are not going to be sold.
If that was happening DC would not step down while any cooperate activity was taking place.
Also looks like he was pushed as addicknt has said.
So we have some disagreement within the company.
Just what are they disagreeing about?

I am in agreement with you addicknt, if he wasn't pushed we would have had a more orderly transition.

ColonelDrake you did not get it right I just checked your posts.
You said Darryl would walk after delivering the strategic review.
The strategic review has not been delivered.
Something else is happening here.
Problem is you are all over the place depending if you're holding or not.
Please don't pretend you have got anything right because you haven't.

Now anybody got any sensible comments, they would be appreciated by one and all.

Didn't see this coming.
Usual offenders already stating that we need a sale.
You couldn't make it up.

Why would you resign after announcing a strategic review.
Makes no sense.

The only people with an illness on this board are those that support Slugs disgusting views.
However, for someone to call Slug his friend is truly sick.

Shipright that's a silly statement.
But you know what, please filter me, because you certainly don't read what I say.

Shipright because I don't add the phrase most likely outcome to every post that doesn't mean I haven't said it enough times over the years.
The sensible posters on here know that.
Try questioning the posters that believe a buyout is coming yet again why they have been wrong for the past nine years.
That's a more important question.