RE: Borrow not Place22 Aug 2019 19:59
Anovas, you and Manyana seems to be operating under the delusion that the institutional investors trust TO'R. What makes you think they're not in the same boat as the rest of us -- stuck with a share price so low it's not worth getting rid of them? What have we got to show for the last time PVR raised $68m back in 2016? We paid off the litigation against TransOcean which the shareholders weren't kept up to date on, we paid our share of one failed drill, and we burned through the rest on god knows what. After the last raise and open offer, the CEO and Technical Director between them held less shares than I did. Is that the sort of thing that fills you full of confidence? I wouldn't trust TO'R as far as I could kick him. I am hanging in here because I trust we have a valuable asset, although even there it took Jimmy24 on one of the bb's to point out that compartmentalisation was a serious risk until higher resolution seismic was collected. So I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that our flagship asset is tainted in some way.
Anyway, all that said, this topic was started by Manyana who said "it would be foolish to do a placing now rather than borrow". And I say again, if you think a lending institution is going to advance $30m to a company struggling to keep the lights on, you're nuts. Even if it did a raise it would only be enough to do the site survey and drill one well, plus pay for whatever delays and blunders we manage to be jinxed by this time. (The impending global economic downturn springs to mind). An appraisal drill does not come with guaranteed success, so we'd either be back at square one or, best case, have a proven asset and still be looking for a development partner. Nope, I reckon this whole endeavour hinges on APEC coming up with the goodies. Do or die, as Manyana's hero across the water might say.