Tarry, To the optimists, a tremor of the impending tsunami; to the pessimists, a little lap of an already-crashed-out wave; and to the capricious, a lapping, a tremor, a tsunami, a lapping, a tremor, a tsunami ad infinitum.
Let’s all return to a former civility amongst ourselves, which has generally been the foremost characteristic of our confabs over the years we have been posting on this board: SML seems to be going through a short-term blip on its way to laying a stable path to reach its long-term aims, on which everyone conjecturally opines, both negatively and positively - and the strategic-review outcome should surface around mid-August, for better or for worse.
Ignoring them, henceforth, will be my stance: one constantly deramps - albeit consistently, yet not dispassionately; while the other uses contradictorily exaggerative language - both positively and negatively - to the extent that he has dispossessed himself of all credibility.
No less than what a few posters have been saying for the past few weeks - already two revenue-generating assets, a mere pipeline dream for the majority of AIM companies.
thankfully remains reasonably sensible and calm despite the recent lack of good omens and impending - yet short-term - bad news; long may all this board's posters' civility continue - many other boards descend into a nadir of petty bickering and insults.
It may well have descended to that price, before the publication of the strategic review; if so, I should hope that it will have, by then, already priced in the review's expectedly short-term bad news.
And, therein lies the the nub of the matter on this share: the short-term journey has become turbulent - but the mid- to long-term ride 'will' be significantly smoother; the former benefits the highwaymen of the investment world while the latter the hardened long-distance travellers.