The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Well done!
No you aren't - let us know what you buy and when!
Prime-very simplistic eg going concern status?
"and I look forward to Mork joining me"
New RNS A new NED granted options at 52p.Thats encouraging
Thanks dibs. I confess I am very prone to believing people and have come unstuck a few times. But I would say he did say these national conversations can take time but they ie higher levels now appreciate the need for digital solutions. Also I do essentially trust young Tom But you clearly have nhs experience so I do not discount your views. I hope my take is correct but lord knows I have been wrong these last three years on various shares eg cpx brh iqai Lvcg nnn ,so many of my racey seeds have fallen on stony ground and this one and seeing machines I hope are going to
Make up for them. Hey ho you win some and lose some ….the next quarter could be huge for both of those. Hope so. Cheers
Hi dibs -disagree with that this year -if you listen to the appg stuff the background is that he is saying to them that you need to get digital solutions in before the winter if you are to relieve pressure on the NHS they .Then if you go to minute 56 of the investor meet presentation he is saying that they ie national authorities have realised that digital solutions are needed and in in a relatively short timeframe and he would expect positive news in due course and he doesnt expect it will be that long. and also if you look at the 4 april rns the contract with qvh is extended to 31 December .
ALL things point to an early commitment by the nhs -he doesnt want to say doors have opened categorically but he clearly believes they will .We will see -god knows I hope that pull it off fast for everyones sake-patients ,clinicians and investors ,and young Tom!
Further to my last post I looked at the end of the investor meet Q a again to show a friend -in fact Tom upped this "very positive" to "extremely positive " .I would recommend looking at that question very near the end re the question on appg group presentation ,which was the context for the answer, to cheer you up while we wait.........He is in my view bursting to say more but cant .
It is the place -lets have some competence ,added value and civility here .
You quote without underlying knowledge Simple . You cant accept you are wrong -even when I have demonstrated that clearly . I gave you that last chance and will now filter you. So much time wasted on your poor posts .
SIMPLE ,unfortunately for you I also used to be a chartered Tax Adviser ! You included excerpts which don't make sense. All the tax issues with directors loans are in relation to loans TO directors ,not the other way around -see below .
So the term directors loans include loans both to and from a director- Tintin 's suggestion was not problematical as you suggested in your smart alec but unfortunately totally wrong email. You have spouted on producing rubbish whilst being totally uninformed on that area. You also tried to shut me down on the going concern point as a has been accountant, again being totally ignorant and missing the point with your copy and paste ,again pretending to know what you were talking about. I regard your posts now as having little value whilst also being offensive . So I will not waste my time reading them any more.
https://www.gov.uk/directors-loans/print
3. If you lend your company money
Your company does not pay Corporation Tax on money you lend it.
If you charge interest
Interest you charge your company on a loan counts as both:
a business expense for your company
personal income for you
You must report the income on a personal Self Assessment tax return.
Your company must:
pay you the interest less Income Tax at the basic rate of 20%
report and pay the Income Tax every quarter using form CT61
Very good presentation though the ceo reminded me of woody allen ,and the cfo looked like he has had a charm bypass !
i will continue to add over the coming weeks once i release funds from a share currently suspended !
I reiterate my previous comment that the loss of the concert will necessitate more audit focus and work on the going concern status.
Simple that is a smart alec comment it is clear what tintin meant from the context
Cassandra!
The effects may not have to be recognised but the note to explain what happened since b s date should include them? Eg a subsequent share issue.
But that is minor. The going concern point is more critical. As of the date of the audit report are there any issues which might cast doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern and cause a qualification This may not but the point I was making was that it has to be considered and that will cause more work and delay.
Ps your mate mb10 I recall was also an accountant. He can confirm I hope ?
Simple that’s not right. The audit report is at the date it is signed and takes into account all facts at that date.
I was a chartered accountant. The post balance sheet event note is also relevant.
The trouble is the debacle of another cancelled concert will impact the accounts because of the post balance sheet event note but more importantly whether the accounts need an audit qualification if there is a doubt about the going concern status This is all astonishingly poor management But no point being hysterical. Wait to get the facts.
Hi vas. Without going into detail I can’t agree with your overall thrust. He went through all the areas as far as i can see but with particular emphasis on the U.K. where he was trying to make the point that the cdcs are now looking to sign contacts and before Xmas India had already been put on the back burner for a while until they got approval to Market bleepa and a subsidiary formed and the hot news was that they have only just got the licence to market there. He also covered off sempurna pilot and strategic change
Frankly he covered all the bases but there is only so much you can do in an hour and his prime aim was to persuade investors that after unwelcome delays the cdc contracts are near term and it is all”very positive”.
I was slightly surprised that fdbk hadn’t rnsed the fact that for The first time they had multi year contract renewals. That would have encouraged the troops !
Anyway let’s hope he is right this time…..he seemed to be very pleased with the results of his APPG representations
Cheers vas