Member Info for Preston55

Gorsuch
Interesting.

RNS Number : 4362Z
Strategic Minerals PLC
15 December 2017

Terms negotiated on Leigh Creek acquisition

I read Hooper earlier when I looked at the Broadreach case updates. Would be interesting to see the correlated dates of the Hooper legal action relative to the text exchange between JP and Brenda, and even more so some of the ear to ear grinning interview dates.

Philadelphia fund manager sentenced to 9 years in prison for $100 million investment fraud
Brenda Smith, 61, will also serve three years of supervised release and be required to pay $47.2 million in restitution.

Will AB go and visit her in chokey?

Talking about Redmoor, I was thinking about New Age Exploration this morning, having a dig around on Google and it looks like Brett Grist and Jon Reynolds figured in the New Age line up at some point. It would be interesting to see a hierarchy of all SML associated companies and personnel, some look to be getting double bubble for sure.

Translation please

http://www.mustangplc.com/documents/Annual%20Report%202021.pdf

The bios make "interesting" reading, if you like artistic license

You may find the crowd at the AGM are as riled as those at the Minter vs Hagler bout!!

DC999 - The expert was the previous owner, he wrote the first couple of revisions of the PEPR, presumably as part of the "earn out"

LME moving to ban Russian Copper

Good post, a bit like the property developer that buys a difficult rebuild (listed) and it burns down days after the auction.....'he can probably do it once and get away with it, but twice?

Potential JV partners delayed, Ukraine no fly zone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NctSVSnUWw4

Soporific

Bowls avetar....?

BCB, you are the Alan Freeman in this fishwives retreat!

And JP was sporting his Goldie Lookin Chain, ala Dell boy

That's quite apt....Trewartha is also a Caper farmer.

That vid is like one used car salesman backing up another used car salesman, buy the mine, we're only one month away from full production!

This hasn't aged well.

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/310266/strategic-minerals-moving-forward-at-leigh-creek-after-securing-key-approvals-10266.html

Actually, just looking at the revision history on page 8, it doesn't look like the DEM formally reviewed the doument until Sept 2020 at Rev 8, so you could say the document is actually at Rev 4 since formal submission to the DEM

Just to clarify, I've no good reason to bash the BOD, i'm probably 75% down on a sizeable investment here, I want it to suceed but at the same time I'd like some transparancy. I just don't accept that any environmental submission should take this long, it's either the content that's amiss, lack of continuity with the reviewers or a combination of both. I had a brief scan through the 1000 pages the other day and a lot of the data is historic data, so whilst 1000 pages sounds a lot of work, alot of those pages is data.

I've paused 3 minutes into watching the update from AB, the statement regarding big players and small players getting the same treatment doesn't wash with me. Both big and small players presumably use the same environmental and mining consultants? It would be interesting to see what the average revision number is for all PEPER's submitted over the last 2 years is, analyse that, present it and then say what you just said AB. I persnally think 9 revisions of a doument is acceptable if you started the project on site at say Rev 3 and the subsequent revisions were for ongoing changes to approach on site. I'd be looking for alternative consultants after say Rev 5 and still not started on site.