Member Info for Potential2Rise

Guys look at GUN vs peers MCAP......

Wow 800% rise needed to equal its peers

#CDL Mcap £15m (grades on samples rock)

MILA Mcap £13.3m

What a gift of Sp here

Seen this on chart two weeks ago

Saying 0.35 could hit

Next Barb rns we could be looking at 0.5p,

Then 1p

Gla

NT to buy

GUN £2m...... Look at it's peers....

Wow 800% rise needed to equal its peers

#CDL Mcap £15m (grades on samples rock)

MILA Mcap £13.3m

NT to buy

Can't buy £500 worth

Mms struggling here

AI acknowledged the valuation here to be accurate as the broker suggested.... 3p to 3.6p

Almost 10 X from current levels

He1

The valuation figures you've presented are accurate representations of a specific analyst's or company's internal projections at a certain point in time, likely calculated using a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model based on the company's publicly available resource estimates.

​Here is a breakdown of why these figures are used and how to interpret their "accuracy":

​1. Validity of the Figures You Provided

​The figures are consistent with the methodology used in resource company valuations:

​Scenario-Based: Valuations for pre-production resource companies are highly sensitive to the commodity price. The different price scenarios (\$400/\text{Mcf}, \$500/\text{Mcf}, \$600/\text{Mcf}) are a standard way to show this sensitivity.

​Resource-Linked: The valuation is explicitly tied to the 2C Contingent Resource estimate from a Competent Persons Report (CPR). This means:

​2C is the "Best Estimate" of recoverable resources that have been discovered but are not yet fully commercial.

​The NPV (\text{Net Present Value}) calculation estimates the future profit from developing only that 2\text{C} resource.

​The resulting share price (e.g., 5.2\text{p} for the Base Case) is a mathematically derived value for the 2\text{C} resource if it is developed.

​Unrisked Potential: The statement about the 2\text{U} (Unrisked Prospective Resource) driving the price to 10\text{p}-12\text{p}+ is also standard.

​2\text{U} is a much larger, but currently less certain, volume of gas.

​If drilling is successful and a portion of this prospective resource is upgraded to a 2\text{C} or 2\text{P} (Proved and Probable Reserves), the asset value increases significantly, hence the higher share price target.

​2. Current Analyst Consensus vs. Your Figures

​Recent analyst coverage for Helium One Global (HE1) appears to have a near-term target that is close to the lower end of your range, but still significantly higher than the current trading price (which is extremely low as of mid-October 2025):

In short, your provided figures represent the calculated intrinsic value of the project's various resource tiers, which is why the analyst consensus target is close to the low end (4\text{p}) of your 2\text{C} range

He1

The valuation figures you've presented are accurate representations of a specific analyst's or company's internal projections at a certain point in time, likely calculated using a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model based on the company's publicly available resource estimates.

​Here is a breakdown of why these figures are used and how to interpret their "accuracy":

​1. Validity of the Figures You Provided

​The figures are consistent with the methodology used in resource company valuations:

​Scenario-Based: Valuations for pre-production resource companies are highly sensitive to the commodity price. The different price scenarios (\$400/\text{Mcf}, \$500/\text{Mcf}, \$600/\text{Mcf}) are a standard way to show thi

This is what Trump administration looking for in Canada

High-grade lead-zinc-silver mineralisation confirmed at the Bear Twit Project

Gunsynd (AIM: GUN) is pleased to provide an update on the Bear Twit Project, in Northwest Territories, Canada, in which the Company holds a 100% legal and beneficial interest.

Following the completion of a recent reconnaissance sampling program by Critical Discoveries Ltd ("Critical Discoveries"), Gunsynd has received assay results confirming high-grade lead, zinc, and silver mineralisation, accompanied by elevated concentrations of gallium, germanium, and copper. High-grade mineralisation was proven across the property, including twelve samples assaying 10% Zn or higher, and five samples with silver values greater than 60 g/t. Importantly, the sampling program identified copper, gallium, and germanium, elements that were not analysed in previous drilling campaigns. The presence of these additional critical metals enhances the potential overall metal endowment of the system.

Highlights

Bear Twit Zone

· K562695 - Subcrop grab: Pb 11.3% | Zn 5.38% | Ag 162 g/t | Cu 0.15% | Ga 4.69 ppm

· K562654 - Outcrop grab: Pb 8.14% | Zn 4.67% | Ag 137 g/t | Cu 0.28% | Ga 2.80 ppm

· K562691 - Subcrop grab: Pb 6.02% | Zn 2.69% | Ag 86.4 g/t | Cu 0.16% | Ga 4.16 ppm

· K562690 - Outcrop chip 0.6 m: Pb 2.07% | Zn 11.5% | Ag 63.7 g/t | Cu 0.12% | Ga 3.6 ppm

· K562689 - Subcrop grab: Pb 4.08% | Zn 0.41% | Ag 83.8 g/t | Cu 0.11% | Ga 2.04 ppm

· K562696 - Subcrop grab: Pb 0.35% | Zn 23.4% | Ga 6.33 ppm

Big Cirque Zone

· K562658 - Outcrop grab: Pb 11.4% | Zn 8.53% | Ga 1.73 ppm

· K562657 - Outcrop grab: Pb 0.69% | Zn 11.35% | Cu 4.3 ppm | Ga 2.04 ppm | Ge 2.86 ppm

· K562664 - Subcrop grab: Zn 11.7% | Ga 5.02 ppm | Ge 0.29 ppm

· K562663 - Float grab: Zn 19.25% | Ga 1.51 ppm | Ge 2.48 ppm

Rev Main Zone

· K562679 - Outcrop grab: Zn 16.8% | Ga 1.82 ppm | Ge 7.26 ppm

· K562680 - Float grab: Zn 21.5% | Ga 3.84 ppm | Ge 3.89 ppm

· K562677 - Outcrop grab: Pb 0.36% | Zn 17.15%| Ga 3.48 ppm | Ge 3.83 ppm

The highest grades were returned from barite-calcite veins and breccias hosted within carbonate rocks of the Lower Palaeozoic. The mineralisation style and geochemical signature are consistent with a Mississippi Valley-Type (MVT) system. In total, 62 rock samples were collected from mineralised showings extending approximately 12 kilometres across the property. All samples were collected in

This is under the radar company and undervalued

"See a WSBN style rise but from a much lower Base. GUN should be 1-2p just looking at other similar companies. If exploration positive on Barb/Bear Twit, see GUN going parabolic."

Just look at GMET, GUN is going totally under the radar, best time to accumulate.

Multiplier7

Won't Suprise if Trump sons starts buying @GunsyndPlc.... Trump sons recently started buying some companies in golf sector,

Critical minerals and metals could be next.

GUN is very cheap for what they have.

Most cash shells valued more the GUN

GLA

GUN has assets in Canada and recently announced good grades from Bear Twits project

Zinc, Germanium, Gallium, silver etc

Market missing this

Amazing potential here

Google this 👇

The Trump administration has purchased a stake in two Canadian critical mineral companies, a move experts say is certainly unusual,

*GUN has assets in Canada and recently announced good grades from Bear Twits project

Zinc, Germanium, Gallium, silver etc

Market missing this

Amazing potential here

Google this 👇

The Trump administration has purchased a stake in two Canadian critical mineral companies, a move experts say is certainly unusual,

Consolidation zone....