The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
True. Declared as such.
Howezap is possibly the most enthusiastic liar here. The drilling results were a massive fail. NOBODY wants 2 million tonnes of sub-ore, least of all Anglo, who have hundreds of more attractive deposits in their little black book. All the gibber jabber since then has been designed to dance away from this brute fact.
Or maybe their entire & ongoing strategy is to delay until the copper price is mental? Who wants to sell at the bottom?
What proportion of their other big Andes copper plays does BHP hold?
Sorry, but they are halfwits.
Agreed. That article is comically lousy.
Their morality is 250 years behind the times - agreed!
All with the best of intentions I'm sure.
Heineken is overrated.
I really don't think the shareprice is undermined by those who "bore'em at the forum."
No need for illegal withholding of assays, they may have got the gist of the numbers from their xrf readings, and decided a batch release of results was preferable. Or, it may well be that the labs are just even more backed up, as has been mentioned here & there. We can only guess.
Because that's what I think. We'll see, I guess.
re all the xtr workers being qualified....well of course they are. If that ensured exploration success then gold would be 2 bucks an ounce!
Well that's ok. You can have a sleep, I'll still be around.
Chile is the world's top copper producer, as such it's a pretty mainstream location. Old mate was saying that it (ngex) is too rugged to build a 10km slurry pipe or conveyor belt or haul road, even though someone had evidently already build an entire processing plant there! So you can see why i didnt dignify that one with an answer.
Steve, it is telling that you feel the need to lie about these comparisons - Los Helados is 10kms away from an operating mIne run by their partner. Not only are they therefore well serviced for infrastructure, but they most likely won't need to build a plant and will simply feed the existing one. Therefore their capital intensity will be incredibly low. And I read your post last night - it sounded very confident off of a 5 minute study of mineral economics 101.
So what year was Bushranger discovered? Does this invalidate the property somehow? And I am certainly not harassing anybody, I am merely making my case that this stock is relatively mispriced. It may go on to greater things regardless.
fear switches off brains
They might be satisfied with their inhouse resource estimate - the process is not a mystical secret. But unlikely, yes.
1200%