REMINDER: Our user survey closes TODAY, please submit your responses here.
If the country won't allow open pits then there is always bananas.
They drag their feet lIke Quasimodo.
Episode 743 : Sean Quixote battles the Lassonde Curve.
Maybe they are waiting to translate the job advertisement into French?
Round numbers are like that.
Christ, we're hard-up for excitement.
Is anyone pleased with our progress over those two years?
I thought it was entirely fantastical where he's floating a block cave scenario...firstly the geometry is all wrong, but put it this way...Crux put out a report saying that Solgold's Alpala couldn't be a viable blockcave despite having half a billion tonnes of 1.4% Cueq. Now it was a bs report of course, but plenty of people bought into it initially. Now compare that to xtr's .2% Cueq....my God, these grades are way too thin for the cheapest bulk Cu production method, which is oxide heap leaching. How the 'ell can such grades pay for the priciest bulk method, ie deep ug block caving??? No experienced answers incoming, I presume...
The smell of unsuccessful drill campaigns?
Blubay, talking about pounds/share is premature, but saying it could be a 100 year resource is not? Same same but different, imo.
Quite right. You said "these results are VERY strong," which simply left me incredulous. Sorry for the mistake. Do you really think these results are very strong? Show me a single copper mine in the world successfully mining these copper equivalent grades at these depths. I know you cannot.
Hawkander, all of these deep results are completely uneconomic. They have no asset here. Other than that, everything is great.
That's not what grade smearing is.
"These results are incredibly strong." ?....incredible lies from jwoz, as usual.
Whatever comes along next, I'm confident these guys will handle it. Listen to this red hot question from Proactive Katie, and hear Minchin's ice cold response. https://youtu.be/J9iUqRRPNro?t=56
Now if she'd asked me that question about the three holes, I would blurt out "Well we could do two holes at once darlin', but It would need more equipment!" And thus I would be sacked. But our man played it with an admirable straight bat.
is it not that thick by definition? Or is that me.
That invention from Tirupati (never heard of 'em) sounds like the real deal. The crucial variable from here would be the cost of production, which will say whether it is niche or world-changing. Coincidentally, my guys gmg.v are using aluminium and graphene to make batteries with (allegedly) 3x the power and that charge 60x faster! As with all "miracle breakthrough" stocks, I know that I don't even know what I don't know. So I keep my gambles smallish.
Re vrs, that concretene innovation is potentially huge, but merely supplying the graphene is not that big a deal. It is similar to adn.ax/mep.ax jv, where instead of graphene they use natural nanotubes, of which they have 10's of millions of tons in the ground! And they have the ip as well. I own mep relaxedly.
Aussies simply make graphene out of natural gas..piece of p×ss. Gmg.v
I'll never be too old for a little Engleburt. Up up and awaaaayyyy....
I wonder how many other names here share an ip address? The mood is always highly unanimous, despite the realities.