RE: Dunkerton, who owns roughly a quarter of Superdry's shares, would seek to take the company private.3 Jul 2024 08:47
The equity raise was tilted in favour of the JD placing as opposed to the open offer for several reasons:-
1) The placing raised more money
The placing raised £10m gross. The open offer would have raised £6.86m gross. However, after costs of £1.95m (why so much?) the placing raised £8.05m net but the open offer would have only raised £4.915m net.
2) Shareholders were urged to vote to also agree to the placing, even if they wanted the open offer. There was a threat that not doing so could lead to the company going into administration. This helped ensure the company could say it had sufficient shareholder mandate for the placing.
3) JD wanted control of the company
In the case of the placing, JD ends up with 75.8% of the company, effectively giving him control. With the open offer he agreed to underwrite the issue, meaning he'd buy any shares not taken up by other holders. Potentially this could have given him up to 90.7% of the company for £6.86m, if no shares were taken up by other holders. However, this would be a risk and if there had been sufficient take-up by other holders he might have ended up with less than the desired 75% for control of the company.