Member Info for PMason

Annunaki – “what I do not understand why share holders use what power they have and the vote directors out of a job,”

Retail shareholders don’t have any powers to vote let alone vote out directors. The real shareholders are the nominee account holders like Barclays, Hargreaves, Interactive Investors etc. Retail investors like yourself are what are known as proxy voters, meaning you vote on their behalf. Before anything is put to the vote the companies work with the nominee account holders to ensure the vote goes the right way. It’s only on rare occasions (and in their financial interest) will the nominee account holders’ side with the proxy retail investors and not allow a particular resolution to pass.

Annunaki – “using the graphs to look ahead suggests that we may be in this holding pattern for another one or two months unless the news comes some are waiting for happens.”

Never mind about another month or two. Everything will be decided by this time next week when the results are due. If they’re not out on or before 30/06/2026 then its goodnight forever.

Anunnaki – “…. talking about how Prem was going to go bust, a year later the company is still trading with light at the end of the tunnel.”

A year ago, today Prem’s price was 0.013p today it is 0.019p a 50% increase. Prem still has a way to go before profitability but one single new licence and ENET becomes profitable immediately.

Anunnaki – “I don't know if ENET will survive, but I like you PMason, you stand against the hoards of the so called righteous who I am guessing have made terrible trades and now they are bitter, I say keep up the good work I like reading your responses.”

You can make terrible trades on the main markets. If you bet on a falling oil price when war has already broken out in the Middle East that’s a terrible trade. Investors don’t make terrible trades on the AIM they are lied to by directors.

ExMS – “I maintain this was over a long time ago “

You were correct, it was. The patent granted in November 2025 has thrown the company one final lifeline.

ExMS – “What exclusivity does that one patent give Ethernity?”

The most difficult of all patents to achieve is in the field of software algorithms even more difficult than pharmaceuticals (look it up), it is nigh impossible. The exclusivity lies in how the software algorithm performs a certain task not in the task itself. For example, you can get a message to a friend in the US by letter, landline telephone, mobile phone, email or carrier pigeon. All achieve the same task but its how the task is achieved as to why email is preferable to letter and letter is preferable to carrier pigeon. The technicals as to why the methodology of ENET patent is exclusive is beyond my technical understanding and I suspect yours as well, but it is explained below.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US12425341B2/en?oq=12425341

Skid - “A successful patent isn't one that has been awarded, it is one that has commercial value.”

Wrong again. A successful patent is one that has been granted. Whether or not it is used to generate cash is another matter.

If DL were intent on transferring the assets of ENET to his own private company, why form the new company on linkedin for shareholders to see whilst ENET are still trading. Why not wait until ENET are delisted and in the hands of administrators. Why would he title the new company in the same space as ENET so disgruntled shareholders can spout conspiracy theories. Sorry it doesn’t stack up.

Not necessarily. The new company can be a subsidiary or working partner of ENET on the back of their successful patent. Stealth companies are set up to achieve maximum secrecy. It might have been a requirement by a third party.

Below is what is linkedin page reads.

C.E.O and Founder

Stealth AI Semiconductor infrastructure company

May 2026 - Present · 2 mos Israel. Developing patent-pending AI infrastructure architecture for large-scale XPU connectivity.

Co - Founder, CEO

Ethernity Networks (LSE listed) · Full-time

Jan 2004 - Present · 22 yrs 6 mos

Israel

ExMS – “Mason Seems you are simply trying to justify a bad trade.”

All trades on the AIM are bad. We’re just looking for that one life changing trade. Regarding your other points: -

DL cut his hours to reduce costs whilst the company progresses the commercialisation of its technology.

There is no need for DL to offer a bridging loan if new licenses are signed. The share price will rise, and they can fund the company from warrants and issuance of new shares.

Insiders are not buying because there aren’t any. Only the directors and third parties would have commercialisation information at this stage, NDAs would also be in place. Nobody else will know until an RNS is released. If insiders are buying on insider information, then this can lead to trouble as ENET are a tiny company on the verge of administration so whoever is buying chunks of the company would be easy to smoke out.

ENET was founded in 2003. DL would not be selling out after 23 years if everything he has worked for is about to come to fruition in the next few months.

Yes, other companies with £billions are trying to solve the power and heat issue but it’s not just a question of money. It’s also a question of technology and luck.

The US Patent Office has confirmed ENET has contributed in part to the resolution of this issue.

Flightman – “I expect levi will delay publication as his intension is to delist and manoeuvre the dreads of the business into his newly incorporated "private business"

This is the nuclear option and not a decision he would want to make. If the shares are delisted no more money can be stolen.

An announcement of a new licensing agreement will cause a substantial rise in the share price allowing the warrants to be exercised and the issuance of further shares based on a re-evaluation of the company’s market capitalisation. This is the option he would prefer.

With the share price and market cap so low for many this is a gamble worth taking.

ExMS - Faster and cheaper networking is at the very heart of the AI revolution. Power consumption and heat generation are the two major drawbacks to the expansion of AI datacentres. For all the lies, deceptions and downright fraudulent statements the company has made over the years the patent granted in November 2025 directly addresses this issue. The patent was first filed in June 2022 it has taken three years and not without good reason for the US Patent Office to allow the patent. The patent must meet two criteria to be allowed. Firstly, it must be novel, the first of its kind and secondly the Patent Office must consider the patent contributes to the industry it addresses. Both criteria have been met. The patent does not necessarily mean commercial success, but its granting would not have escaped the attention of the telecom/network industry. I believe the company is telling the truth when it says it has been working with Tier 1 industry partners, but no contracts have been signed yet. These things take time. It’s still less than a year since the patent has been granted. No contracts could have been signed prior to November 2025 as patent protection was not guaranteed, it is now.

As for the company delisting or going into administration to funnel the patent into private concerns I don’t altogether agree. Whilst listed the company may still has access to other people’s money for free, something no company gives up lightly and this company is one of them that’s why the lasting placing was at 0.004p a price you need an electronic microscope to see.

Only 13 days left to find out if its boom or bust. I am still optimistic about the commercialisation of their Long Prefix Matching patent.

Etoh – “Even worse , the pinkies and greenies, who believe the hype and vote yeah and stump up cash to allow it to continue.”

Retail investors don’t stump up cash only the market makers stump up cash for the company. For example, retail investors purchase shares on the open market at 10p. The market makers work through a discount placing at 5p. Retail investors are not aware a discount placing has been worked until an RNS is announced. The market makers replace the 10p shares with 5p shares. The 5p retail investors have lost is passed onto the company as a placing minus the market maker fees. This is why we fall for it every single time. If retail investors become aware of a placing the entire AIM collapses overnight.

The share price at 0.0012p and market cap at £312k is so low it does not need specific contract news to multibag. The markets need only be convinced the company will be a going concern for the next 12 months and it will multibag on that reasoning alone. We’ll all find out in 17 days’ time or less. Normally a discount placing would be bad news for a share price but in this case if and it’s a BIG IF they can get a placing away at 0.0010p it could also cause a rerating if the market sees the funding as buying time until commercial contracts are signed.

Word of warning. If the results are not out on or by 29/06/2026 I would not personally hang around until 30/06/26.

SANT – “Next week going down and I’m gonna buy some more”

Buy more? If you knew they were going down next week you wouldn’t still be holding any this week

Maidit3038 – “Holding on to all its 27% gain on one of those unexpected spikes we have seen over the past few months is IMO unusually interesting”

Retail shareholders have cottoned onto the one-day spikes so are not falling for it again this is why volumes are low. MM now must try another tactic which is to allow the spikes over 2 – 3 days. Hopefully this will trick the gullible into thinking the recovery is permanent and for real. Then out comes the placing dumps come again.

Ilovesushi - ” Can you now see this plonker has done well to avoid the company?”

Yes, but that’s because the plonker has lost his money elsewhere. Nobody who invests in AIM stocks has the right to berate anybody who does. We are all suckers looking for that one stock that can change our lives.

Anun – “PMason, I will have some spare cash come Monday do you think it is a good idea to by more ENET shares?”

It’s not a good idea at the moment. ENET has a big hurdle to jump and it’s the year end accounts due on or before 30/06/2026. If the results are not out by 30/06/2026 the stock will be suspended. ENET must be able to see a cash runway for the next 12 months to 30/06/2027 for the accounts to be signed off as going concern. If it anticipates the revenues coming in as stated in RNS 05/05/2026 then the accounts can be signed off. If it doesn’t then finance will have to be raised. If they can’t raise sufficient funds the stock will be suspended pending clarification of its financial position and unlikely to ever return. It is not a good sign that DL has set up another company in May 2026 doing exactly what ENET does. Some think its in preparation for when ENET goes into administration. I’m not so sure myself.

SANT666 - "If I can get some more under 0.0010 would be lovely , which I’m sure I will"

If you were sure you could get some under 0.0010 you would have never bought the ones you hold over 0.0010p in the first place. If you're claiming you've already got some under 0.0010 and wanting some more you're a liar because they have never been under 0.0010 to buy.

Annunnaki. “PMason, I quite new to investing in shares, I used to trade different instruments, but one thing I know is that a lot of directors should be in prison for fraud”

You can’t be new to shares and know a lot of directors are fraudsters. This only comes with decades of experience. Your LSE profile shows you have been a member since July 2022, so what are you calling new? As for the most ring wing governments they tend to be the biggest crooks of them all supporting fraudulent directors (just my personal opinion).

Annunnaki. Like you I believe there is tremendous upside from here if they can get the Long Prefix Matching commercial. But don’t defend the company’s history or attack those who have every right to call this for exactly what it is.

Annunnaki – “Has there ever been a lower share price for an aim company of 0.012?”

Yes, there is a company called ENET priced at 0.0012p 90% lower.