RE: RISING SP6 Feb 2020 13:14
TW is Tom Winnifrith of ************* self employed journalist (the unemployable kind perhaps). Has had 4 wives and string of failed businesses according to google, including funds costing people lots of money. Calls himself sheriff of AIM though and claims he is smeared for outing the real bad guys. Many think he has multiple aliases on here and some have developed sophisticated lexical analysis tools to detect the infantile writing style. Sometimes if you hit some of the botflies hard with anti TW info they stop for a while it seems to be a good way of silencing some.
Claims to want to retire and be a goat and olive farmer. Had a pizza business that failed. Zak Mir appears to be godfather of one of his children but I thought they must have fallen out because SPs called him a sith lord on their site I think recently (but I never go past the paywall and might have that mixed up). They are probably the doomsters ZM refers to they seem to have an OCD against this share since calling it wrong in October (maybe shorting it after the first rise). They said it aimed to be a cash shell but it has 3 assets so would not be if it sold MT but this is the quality of journalism I'm never tempted to go past the paywall but when you are new and gullible it looks quite legit, but then you notice the website is crap. One of them is a fishing journalist Winnifrith has some city experience I think been to oxford probably not the daftest in all senses. Makes me think of Jeffrey Archer.
It's probably quite difficult to write about shares without landing in lots of hot water, especially if you are a trader. Hence a lack of much competition and why you might cling to something like Share Prophets that appears a bit renegade and get rich quick.
************* I read were once linked in with ADVFN maybe in a similar way to sharetalk seems linked to LSE a bit, but SP were ditched I think. There are quite a few websites about this out there from it appears disgruntled investors in TW, as much as anyone TW has outed.
Because the FCA once thanked him for reporting some suspicious activity he claims to have been personally thanked by the FCA, despite the fact they probably do this to anyone who does. Makes out like he has been endorsed.
So one to be aware of DYOR just from what's out on the web and my latest take as a slightly biased EUA backer (they called us a cult and we have a similar name for them). Under their own terms when you you are 1500% up in less than a year we must be winning at their game?
I'm quite new though for others this stuff goes back years.