RE: BPL028 extremity hole with the least mineralisation in Feb results8 Sep 2020 10:31
The next hole shouldn't take long at all as two went off first of all. I think hole 28 came back first as was an extension hole so shorter and the way it ended with gold made them curious. It seems that hole 40 went deeper than planned so probably they have more hope for that one, also hence the photo showing sulphide indications at 624m deep. I guess that result may have a fair influence on whether they decide to do stage 3 drill.
I don't think this was meant to be the big reveal RNS just a positive update. It doesn't seem to have been taken that way but plenty to keep the hopes up. I wasn't expecting steady increases in gold I was expecting to suddenly hit high grade gold at depth if it went well, with some shear tails like they have found. So it's still to play for in my eyes.