So, what's next?13 Dec 2017 13:54
Sadly, as mentioned on occasions, CEO's are not that interested in the Shareholder once they have what they want. Most CEO's pay themselves way to much...simply because they can. When something is in the offing, like a Drill or a new deal that 'will benefit the Shareholder', they will issue another 'grovelling' RNS to explain what the next Placing is for.
Naturally, it will contain lots of goodies to try to lure the Investor to parting with their hard earned. Further down the line, we end up pretty much the same as it is here; they win, we lose, but not necessarily and not all the time. However, judging by Stefan's overall performance and they way he 'stands by his Shareholder's', he's painted a rather grey picture of himself, reflecting his general attitude towards his Shareholder's and how he 'always keeps us updated'?
These AIM guys are nearly all the same: They get want they want, and it's 'here today and gone tomorrow'. Thankyou very much, Stefan or should it be Stuff'em, either way, I still think that a degree of cynicism is totally justified? I doubt that he will change and once even more cash starts to dribble in, he won't get any better.
It depends on the deal that Stefan can strike up. We all know it can take some years to come to fruition, but it doesn't take years to get positive and regular updates with genuine tangible progress that we know we will do well from...usually! (Blocks!!) If you look at the bulk of AIM shares, in the grand scheme of things, many of them fail and disappear. The CEO's of such companies usually do well. Philip Greed (n) is one such example. They are nearly all tarred with the same brush?
Merry Christmas, Stefan. We all know it will be a good one for you.
(Of course, those feeling rather vocal can attend the next AGM, and let fly there. At least get your money's worth somehow?)