Member Info for Phil7390

Fairly sue he was a ramper of UKOG in the past. That went well for him if so.

Why don't you tell us, rather than just throwing sh*t and hoping something sticks?

Telling phrase in that article Skelly:

"CATL sees the mass production of its Naxtra sodium-ion battery pack as the beginning of a “dual-chemistry” phase for EVs, where the right technology can be selected by EV makers for the correct application."

Even the manufacturer isn't touting this as a replacement for Lithium.

"Run at ATH". All time high? £1.04? That would be welcome, but a tad unlikely just yet.

Oops, 30 Dec.

Up 18% on 30 Jan. Hoping for some sustained recovery in Jan.

The current price for Lithium is largely irrelevant, market dynamics are changing as the EU focuses on local supply.

Was thinking just that yesterday. If someone were to divine the degree of spread ahead of time, there's a quick return. Of course, no-one knows what the MMs are going to do with the SP, do they?

Do you mean DFS?

Well I'm only 95% down on these now, that's good.

Critical thinking? With a comment like that I'd start with the basics mate.

Skelly seems to think that something only exists when it is published. At that point it just IS, like the Big Bang, and prior to that singularity there is nothing.

There seems to be a prerequisite to thinking with your brain. I wonder if he can work out what it is?

Nah, it's Skelly.

They are there on my a/c, just classed as "Other" and have no value.

"EMH aren't in the gigafactory industry ..."

Shortsighted much?

Oh, and, for a pedant, I find your mangling of the ellipsis a tad ironic. It's three dots.

You're not the Skelly who touted ODX a few years back are you?

I am, but not about to sell, and should have bought more a month ago so not buying now either.

Has anyone noticed how certain individuals are reduced to pedantry? It's almost like they don't have an actual argument.

“As would be expected in such circumstances, we were unable to provide information on this matter whilst a revised project configuration was being formulated, due to social and environmental impact sensitivities and had to defer the DFS until the details of the new site were agreed,” Coughlan added.

“We understand that a deferral to a DFS is usually considered a negative matter, but in this case, we consider it to be for a positive result, particularly as the Prunéřov site is currently home to the Prunéřov Power Plant, and the permitting can now be advanced in a more timely manner with the cooperation of the local, regional and federal governments.”

Does anyone genuinely think that no work to incorporate this move into the DFS will have been done until this announcement was made? Or maybe it has been under review for quite a while - as is pretty much stated in the first paragraph quoted above?

That's been my worry for a while.

As that's behind a paywall could you precis what it says please?