Member Info for PGlancy

You weren't paying attention were you shy. Trying opening your ears or asks someone with more understanding of nda’s. There were at least 2 insightful clues in the q&a. How come such a smartass like you missed them?

Cancelled mine long ago. It's difficult to get a read when he becomes so emotional. He allows himself to get used as bat.

The answer is on lemming.

Shy youre commenting an event you have no insight of. There was no attempt to pump. It was a q&a for investors gripes that needed addressing. There was no attempt to pump on forward events. Obviously, those continuing to sell after tws bs will regret. The posts on Substack are almost 100% positive. As far better forum than this p o s.

By all means continue with your childish agenda. It shows you for who you really are. A simple Simon.

Toying, nda are big standard in the industry. You can whine about this all you like, it doesn't change the fact Croda clients will have insisted in nda to protect trade secretes and formulations ahead of any launch. I had you pegged as one of the more astute here. How wrong i am.

Indeed usually London where everyone loves to travel to. I wonder what the average agm attendance is? A handful a dozen? Jezz 💤

Stop arguing with my know it all. What shy says goes, the end.

Yes of course because you’re always right. I suppose you were in the room when documents were sign. As you say, I’ll get back in my box.

Belgrano, i asked a similar question. Elric says there’s nothing than can be discussed while as he suggests, potential Sederma clients have their boots on the neck of Croda and in term, Croda will not allow skin to discuss events until the cat is out of the bag, which i assume to be products with Zenakine inside. I challenged saying clarity on SD wouldn’t go a miss only for him to point out he has as much noteworthy comment fact checked by Sa to be going in with and it is all about Croda royalties and therefore everything else is a side show as far as investors are concerned.

Toying sometimes you throw the toys and make a mess. I accept aqua may make more sense than me. However, i specially remember Elrico saying he asked Sa and he confirmed h1 was audited. Now i know you both spoke about the same topic. The question then is have you adopted selective memory or are you just trying to be a control freak?

And yes, i agree with aqua on why there would have been an audit process.

I'll get back in my box now. Please do the same.

There you go. I had every faith you'd get there in the end.

Finally, someone understands the point.

Correct, but you're wrong. H1 were audited last year. The rns said there weren't, but elrico spoke to Sa who said they were audited and were for a purpose, which he didn't elaborate on further. I suspect if was to make sure a certain defcon was paid by the ex owner calling in favour, if you get my drift.

They won't be published next month. We know Sa like to have h1 audited. Experienced investors will know why and the clue begins with a D. Also, even with the dearth of exits from aim, there's still a problem with getting accounts signed off quickly or orderly. Even incompetence has a price.

Out of interest Simon. D is you report the one inside Tw site? 🤡

He did speak to him. It's a timing issue. Keep up.

Not quite. The article you're thinking of is linked back to it.

Opti continue to with their fire sale due to poor sales? Oh wait, Soh said he would t sell below 35p. I must be wrong.

Thanks Toyin

I hope they break rule 17 because everytime this company issues an RNS the share price drops.