Member Info for PGlancy

Gardie, i subscribe to both services. They have very different risk profiles. Lemming, risky blue sky hopeful, small company champion, established growth companies. Who thought Rolls Royce would multibag. Excellent record across their naps.

the last fool who 'asked as a newbie' ened up being banned. he lives on ad vf n for the posts part as gerbilator. ******ed by all accounts. he also spammed with multiple posts when he could have put he b s in a single post. filtered.

Unlike Davidson who fails to inform lies to the market about the severity of his ceo illness and commits fraud in an rns.

I’m sure mol was all over that as well. Thank god for the great mol looking after us poor morons.

Cheers mol

Jees

Have you read Judy's comments? Is she an insider? She's certainly technical.

You didn't turn of for your own debate. Others did.

Judy. Shychap sounds like one of those little boys not fed from his mother tit.

Not very lady-like, i know. I bet i'm correct.

Toyin. He won’t critique on Substack because he knows he will get schooled. Agree with PJ, block and delete.

Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

― Mark Twain

PJ. He needs the LSE average intelligence to continue then? Block and delete.

18 LIKES.

The wheel 'came off' because there were 2 or 3 axis distribution deals on the table that had not been signed off. Rightly or wrong, the board held out for a mn which hasn't materialised. Also, its taken over 2 years to get the npf signed off. Maybe the board have realised they need a large retailer to get the mn on the hook. It sounded like that in the interview.

Btw, i relisened to the interview. Elrico did ask for clarification on the use of the funds. Asked and answered if you pay attention. I'll notch that up as another lie by Shychap.

Leap, you're right. Elrico should have pushed back and asked for more clarity on the breakdown of the funding. I emailed Elrico, because he doesn't usually make such a mistake. He explained another question he had no prepped for popped into his head and tried to get his pen to work and lost track of the answer. I suggest you read yesterdays post. He also said he finds himself in a hightened nervous position before the interview, this was evident right from the outset, more than any other interview he has done. He must have repeated himself 4 times, even stating Sa is his fav ceo. No statement like that should ever be made. To his credit, he didn't edit it. ISN'T STRANGE THERE ARE SO ANY ACTIVISTS AFTER EACH INTERVIEW.

Oh, really. You call it fake news. It was you that declared you had access in earlier posts. Now, you claim its a trial period. I am not aware there is a trial option. The truth of the matter is much simpler. You, shychap are a liar and a coward. You talk nonsense, demonstrate you have no understand of the issues you raise, and when you are offered the floor, on the day you had access, you now claim your trial ended. SHYCHAP IS A LIAR AND A COWARD. he has just been caught in a web of his own deceit.

From the outset, I wish to clarify that I am not attacking Shychap behind the paywall; he is a premium subscriber, and we thank him for this.

He isn’t posting mindless criticism—it’s engaged, informed, and principled, even if it’s sharply worded. He doesn’t appear to suffer from “Elric Derrangement Syndrome,” or anti-company, but seems to be calling for greater rigour, discipline, and equality in how information is managed and disclosed. Their concerns would resonate with any long-term investor fatigued by volatility without validation. I think we can all agree with this in principle. However, Shychap does seem to be making a fundamental mistake and doesn’t understand our role or appreciate it.

You do realise you are talking to his subscribers here. You are a coward. You want him to engage here so your troll syndicate can pile on. He was correct. That is your intention. You're not to be trusted. I put it to you, you don't wish to reveal yourself out of fear you get kicked out for lying and lose access. Very telling, shychap. You're not an honest broker are you. Here's the link you are trying to convince everyone you don't know what i'm referring to. https://lemminginvestor.substack.com/p/skinbiotherapeutics-plc-11e You must have closed your eyes when you scrolled past it. lol

It's not private. The floor has been opened for you to question his interview. He thinks you provided a reasonable critique, but you misunderstand certain aspects. If you are afraid to debate him, be honest rather than makes silly excuses. You said it yourself, There is no reason for posting messages about a lemming update because everyone gets an email alert anyway. Now you pretend you don't know what i'm talking about.

He's just a troll seeking clicks from the usual suspects. Oh, wait, its not a popularity contest. My bad!

Here yeah go. https://lemminginvestor.substack.com/p/skinbiotherapeutics-plc-11e

Shychap, you have been given a respectful response. Why not engage and stop with the hypocrisy. I'm reporting your post for breaching your own hypocrisy.

Yes. He's whining again. Elric has thrown down the gauntlet to him.

I a learning Musky is taking the first box of zenakine up on hiss next space x mission.

Shy, you must be fun to live with. Obviously, several members did. I guess you ignored the comments section. The benefit payday will be when investors get sight of what is hidden behind the nda. We have confirmation, but until its in writing, Sa isn't trusted just yet. Or did this escape your thought process as well?

1 area we agree on, Sa should have been clearer with his breakdown of the funds allocation and perhaps elrico should have pushed him harder on this area. However, i'm prepared to believe elrico is no gerry packsman. You would have nailed though, right. Nothing gets past you, shy. Remind us all...how many ceo's have produced?

It was negligible.

Shy, I bet you're the sort of person that whines when someone parks outside your house. You are truly pathetic if a minor incursion trigger so easily. There's nasty stuff going on in the world and your triggered about references to another site, even though you benefit from it. You need help.

How curious. Shychap is quick to the draw when he learns there is a link to the very substack he is eager to latch onto. Is quick to report to lse if it offends his sensibility. Yet here we are, he is offering an opinion on his take of the interview. He should have listened more closely to the beginning and the end. If he doesn't like Sa's response, maybe he should contact investor relations making clear he isn't pleased with the politician answer to specific questions.