RE: A nudge from Ashman13 Jan 2026 10:21
Shy, are you deranged or a tw sock puppet? You resorted to the same tw playbook. Quote selective comments to fit a narrative. Why not producte in whole?
Here it is. It was on sp. It's critical of sbtx, or did you miss these sections. Read carefully, you little deciever. There are also comments about them causing mischief, you wind you and Tw up like a clock. In reality, they were having a spot of sport.
Elrico
a month ago
Alex isn't wasting his time. His suggestion-one I fully support-isn't without purpose. It's designed, "quite deliberately, to frustrate the likes of Simon Chapman" and his small battalion of Pl's (Whatever), who seem to believe they speak for the majority of shareholders.
Yes, many investors are understandably exasperated- so are we-but there remains a willingness among the patient to endure the current ambiguity until the much-anticipated reveal from the Croda/Sederma partnership. At that point, there'll be no curtain left to hide behind.
No doubt there are some itching to give Ashman a bloody nose, and others hoping for yet another doomed coup, as we saw play out at OPTI. That ended well, didn't it? What did it achieve? Absolutely nothing-aside from a bit of theatre and a lingering mess.
With a growing investor base rallying behind Ashman, not to mention the support of DB, MD, and new institutional interest, what exactly would a vote against the Chairman and CEO accomplish? Certainly nothing transformative.
So yes, l agree with Alex-though mainly because I fancied wearing the cloak of a vindictive prat for a change. I've no doubt this will irritate a few people, and I'll probably be banished to Coventry for an extened period. Frankly, I couldn't care less.
AIM rules are clear. One-third of directors retire by rotation each year. No director goes more than three vears without re-election. Remind this stupid arse-liking fury, when was the last election?
Free speech my arse!