RE: Farewell10 Jan 2024 11:12
Hi,
It remains to be seen if my comments regarding SA weakness are harsh. As far as i am concerned we live in a period where protest groups dictate where companies even advertise, they bow too easily to a tiny minority. In this case, one tight sod grudges paying a poxy £35 for access to someones work. Think about this for a moment. Nick1978 wants free access to the hundreds of hours work for nothing and uses the pretext of the paywall. This a deception. Why do i claim this? I subscribe to SP, IC, Shares and Small Company Watch, and I do mean all, conduct interviews, and they are all subscription services, which means Elric is being targetted by a vengeful, spiteful troll. It is pathetic, and this is why i genuinely feel SA has proved himself a weak CEO. To allow one persons grudge over several months to dictate how he interacts with investors when there are plenty of alternatives is dam weak. As for the mini hitler, Giles, he should be sacked. I wonder what TW will think about his role in this. If i understand it, his SP has no future role in working with SA his subscribers which i am sure will be many 1000s will rely of pathetic proactive or even worse, vox platforms. I hope TW gets to learn one vengeful pathetic cretin has called a stop to him doing interviews with a CEO. I am ok with IMC because it forces a presentation which is another expense. Will our questions be answered or even get through? I have submitted more than 30 questions for 5 companies. Not one of them were answered. I submit they will be highly selective.
I repeat, SA is weak. He has demonstrated this with the manner he has dealt with Croda. He should have insisted on some form of upfront given they are more than 2 years late to commercializing the lysate. SA was in a box position but did not use his bargaining position, hence the small dilution, but these small dilutions mount up.