Member Info for Persimmone

Zzzz goodnight short seller

Times are changing and I'm muscling in girls and boys against the negative thesis

Goodnight

It’s amusing how you always try to redirect the focus when valid points are raised. Instead of addressing the actual facts or countering with substance you resort to analysing punctuation and style. Talk about scraping the barrel.

As for the share price no one here claims posts directly change it. That’s your strawman argument. What does influence sentiment are deliberate attempts to undermine confidence with half-truths and misdirection something you and your like-minded posters seem to specialise in. But here’s the kicker. Long-term investors don’t fall for cheap deflection tactics. They see the bigger picture. Solid assets strategic growth and potential upside.

Your obsession with personal attacks just highlights how rattled you are by anyone challenging the negative narrative. Thanks for proving that facts still hit a nerve.

Oh Winny

Let’s get real for a second. If you’ve learnt not to believe anything from the CEOs or anyone else here, then why stick around except to push your own narrative? Everyone here is capable of forming their own opinions without the constant doom and gloom.

Relentless underperformance is a broad claim with little context. There have been tangible steps taken, developments made and opportunities pursued. None of it is flawless but it’s hardly worth the overblown cynicism. Supporting a company isn’t blind loyalty. It’s about recognising the long-term strategy and potential despite short-term challenges.

If you’re so sure nothing and no one here has credibility, maybe it’s time to reflect on your own contributions. Are you here to inform or just to sow doubt for personal reasons? Genuine criticism is fine but relentless negativity often says more about the critic than the subject.

Lmfao 😂, spoken to you many times? What are you, their confidante now? Let’s not kid ourselves. Your entire shtick revolves around stirring doubt while claiming some inside track that conveniently aligns with your never-ending negativity.

As for filtering you, I don’t filter baseless noise—I call it out. You’ve been spinning the same tired lines for ages, hoping to undermine confidence in the company. Waste my time? Hardly.

Watching you scramble to justify your agenda is more entertaining than anything else. So please, continue yes every post you make only reinforces what everyone here already suspects about your true intentions.

Oh TW.crew

Well, at least you’re consistent, I'll give you that throwing insults instead of substance. Funny how someone who claims not to care is always lurking and quick to respond. The only garbage here is your relentless negativity. You don’t care how many shares I own, yet you seem obsessed with trying to undermine anyone who supports the company. Transparent much?

Always playing the concerned observer while constantly bashing the company.

Claiming you’re just here to warn others, but your negativity always seems perfectly timed to stir doubt.

It seems pretty clear to me you have a vested interest, whether it’s fueling shorts or riding sentiment swings. Let’s not pretend you’re neutral. Anyone paying attention can see through it.

Fear Uncertainty and Doubt

Shorting Dogs Best Friend

They hate investors like me who fight the narratives.

Had I listened to the idiots at Angus or GKP

Hey exactly

Ill keep doing my long thesis trade here

As for TW aliases lmfao 🤣

Back with your usual charm. So, shareholders aren’t as smart as you say because 90% are supposedly down? That’s just AIM stocks for you, volatile and unpredictable. Everyone who invests knows the risks, but you love to pretend you’re the voice of reason while pushing your own narrative.

As for Colle Santo, yes, bring it on. Unlike your constant negativity, some of us can see the real potential there. Sorry if that doesn’t fit your usual doom-and-gloom script.

And idiot poster child trouble maker, lol at West Newton? Sure, let’s rewrite history to make it sound like everything would be perfect under someone else. Reality doesn’t work like that, but why let that stop you?

Keep the love-to-the-gang routine going, though. It’s almost funny how hard you try to sound impartial when we all know what you’re about.

Charming, 'What gain?' Really? You've spent more time here than most actual shareholders, endlessly posting negativity, claiming you're just a concerned observer. The reality is clear to me: your vested interest lies in trying to drive sentiment down.

If you truly wished hard-working people the best of luck, you'd offer balanced views instead of relentless doom and gloom. Instead, you mock shareholders and dismiss AIM as a 'casino' while conveniently ignoring UJO's successes and strong fundamentals.

And let’s not pretend you're just waiting to 'buy back in.' Your track record screams short-seller tactics. It’s fine to have your angle, but at least own it instead of playing this hollow 'good Samaritan' act. The shareholders here are smarter than you give them credit for. Peace out

Pretty clear TW crew can't handle being smoked out as non shareholders preying on weak hands

Gravy train stopped

New boss in town and that's me as a 1% shareholder and will add

Thanks for the dirt cheap shares

Let’s break this down. First, citing someone as a credible source on anything UJO-related is laughable that persons got a well-documented bias against the oil industry. Using it as your go-to reference is like asking a fox to write a report on henhouse security.

Second, the North Kelsey angle. Yes, Egdon pulled out of the appeal, but 'adding diversity' refers to UJO’s broader portfolio strategy. Not every project pans out, but that doesn’t negate the overall value of a diversified asset base. Presenting it as misleading is just you cherry-picking to fit your narrative of course jeez.

And on the dividends and bonuses? Let’s not pretend this is unique to UJO. Dividends are rare in AIM stocks and while management compensation can always be debated, the company has consistently delivered value over the long term. The real question is, why are you still here if you think so little of the company? Loyal shareholders can see through your transparent attempts to steer sentiment for your own gain.

Let’s cut through the pretense. You’re not fooling anyone with the 'I could buy back in tomorrow' line. Your history shows a pattern of relentless negativity, and it’s clear your interests lie in the share price declining, not in any constructive discussion. The repeated references to failed projects and cherry-picking bad news only serve to push the same old shorting agenda.

And citing commentary from a known anti-oil campaigner to bolster your argument? Come on. That’s like quoting a vegan activist to critique a steakhouse. It’s clear your goal is to create fear and doubt not to genuinely evaluate the company’s prospects.

If you’re really as detached and capable of buying back in as you claim, why not acknowledge the positives once in a while? Or is that inconvenient for your thesis? Genuine shareholders deserve better than your veiled attempts to manipulate sentiment.

Always question a negative posters intent

Especially when they don't own stock

I want profit from a raised sp unlike them

Your subtle negativity is becoming rather predictable. You claim to speak 'the truth,' yet your comments conveniently align with the shorting narrative, offering nothing constructive or forward-looking. Let’s not kid ourselves, you're no shareholder. Real investors, even those disappointed, occasionally acknowledge positives or potential upsides. Your sole focus seems to be fostering fear, uncertainty and doubt, which just so happens to benefit a certain type of market participant. The question is, why are you so invested in seeing this decline when you're clearly not holding shares? Perhaps the answer lies not in sentiment, but in your vested interest.

Strongly disagree all you like, but your track record of relentless negativity and uncanny alignment with the usual shorting suspects says otherwise. If you're truly independent, why not offer a balanced view for once? Even the most disgruntled shareholder can acknowledge the occasional positive. The fact you never do speaks volumes. Either you're astonishingly unlucky in finding only faults, or there’s more to your motives than meets the eye. Care to clarify?

All you negative posters here, Advfn and X are linked

A motley crew of cretins feasting on fear uncertainty and doubt

Shame on you

And this is a great stock actually

You need to ride waves to make profit

Truth hurts being outed hey same single keyboard paid shorter of TW gang who never go long

More and more readers will start linking all these aliases to shorters and The Muppets from TW gang and we will be at 15p

This is swiftly back up soon