Member Info for Persimmone

First off, it's funny how you frame yourself as someone looking out for others when it's clear there's another agenda here. Creating negativity around Reabold benefits those who hold short positions. It's not about helping people; it's about working as part of a pack to spread doubt and profit from it.

The argument about Reabold's cash position and being debt-free misses the point. Reabold has chosen a strategy to fund exploration responsibly without relying on debt, which is prudent in a high-risk industry. Comparing this to putting money in a tin ignores the nature of oil and gas development, which takes time and investment to unlock value.

You talk about WN’s valuation in 2019 as if the company has done nothing since, but that’s just selective reading. Oil and gas exploration comes with challenges, and the £247m NPV was always subject to variables like technical results and market conditions. Pretending otherwise is misleading.

Your claim to have read hundreds of RNSs doesn’t make your analysis valid. Projects take funding to progress, and Reabold has avoided taking on dangerous levels of debt. Calling this a failure is disingenuous at best.

If you truly believed Reabold was doomed, you'd have moved on by now. Instead, you're here spreading negativity, hoping it will serve your interests. Investors see through this, and your attempts to undermine confidence only highlight your own agenda.

First off, let’s address the paranoia claim. It’s funny how every bit of optimism about Reabold is dismissed as some coordinated campaign. Investors like me don’t need a conspiracy theory; we’re here because we see potential plain and simple.

Calling Reabold 'Laurel and Hardy' might sound clever but doesn’t hold water when you consider the company’s solid cash position and debt-free status. These aren’t characteristics of a failing business. Institutions leaving isn’t necessarily a bad sign either; market cycles and sector trends play a huge role, especially in exploration-heavy industries.

As for WN, no one’s expecting results overnight. Serious investors understand the long-term nature of oil and gas projects. And Colle Santo isn’t just a punt; it holds real potential for value creation.

If you’ve exited and are no longer invested, why the relentless negativity? For those of us still here, we’re focusing on the opportunities, not the noise

Smoked out.

Uggy with his fake holdings let the cat out the TW gangs bag

Acting like hyenas

However the confirmation he isnt representing just himself alone is the statement shown and written as "we"

Thats the direct evidence of a slip of the tongue.

Admission? He operates with the rest of the negative posters as a collective who are indeed profiting from Short Selling Reabold

Read again

"No Simon, he invades this bb with his views & then gets on his high horse when we ask a question. I much prefer the balanced view itsawrap posts."

For all the negative idiots here - No thanks go find information yourselves

If you were decent to me I'd have easily sent the link. I have sent it to a few here for sure.

Watch this space...

Alright, let’s take a step back here. It’s easy to throw around insults like 'Laurel and Hardy' and claim it’s all a disaster, but let’s look at what’s actually happening. Reabold isn’t some overnight success story, and no one ever claimed it would be. The company is tackling complex, high-potential projects, and that takes time, effort, and yes, funding.

Colle Santo is progressing—this isn’t a ‘punt’ but a calculated step forward. West Newton? Sure, it’s been delayed, but calling it a ‘car crash’ is a stretch when the necessary groundwork and permissions are in process. Energy projects of this scale and ambition are never easy or quick, but that’s where the potential payoff comes from.

If you’re so sure it’s all doomed, why spend so much time here ranting? Genuine investors are focused on what’s ahead and see opportunities where others see challenges. Keep the negativity coming if it makes you feel better, but the rest of us will keep watching Reabold take steps forward

I get it, you're frustrated, and that's totally fair. Everyone wants to make a profit, but sometimes investing takes time and patience. Reabold is moving forward with clear steps to unlock value, and they're working through some tough market conditions. Sure, not everything goes smoothly in the short term, but that doesn't mean there isn’t a long-term vision. As for the advice about selling—well, that's everyone's choice. But some investors are in it for the bigger picture and understand that it's a journey, not a sprint. Maybe you’ll see that too as things unfold

"Persimmone

Posts: 81

Price: 0.0475

Strong Buy

RE: He lost a Fortune15 Dec 2024 11:08

Fascinating how someone who claims to have 'made a slight profit' and knows everything about the supposed 'crooks' running Reabold still holds shares and spends their time obsessively warning others. If you truly believed the company was a lost cause, why remain invested? It sounds more like a personal grudge than an informed mission. Your 'warning' feels less about helping others and more about justifying your fixation on a single stock. Maybe focus your energy on stocks you believe in rather than one you call a mistake; unless, deep down, you think there's still value here that you're hoping to benefit from.

Recommend (7)"

It’s easy to throw around criticism but let’s look at what’s actually happening here. Reabold is focused on developing key energy projects like West Newton, and the management team has been working to secure long-term value for shareholders. Sure, it’s not on the main market, but AIM is designed for companies like this that are growing and tackling ambitious projects in a tough sector.

The co-CEOs have made decisions like increasing stakes in high-potential assets and progressing development plans in line with the UK’s energy security needs. These aren’t moves made by people looking for a “lifestyle company.” The energy sector doesn’t hand out quick wins—it’s all about patience, strategy, and expertise.

Calling names and complaining doesn’t change the fact that Reabold is still pushing forward and building toward monetizing its assets. If you’ve got a better plan or real evidence of mismanagement, fair enough, but just throwing out insults doesn’t prove anything. Let’s stick to facts, not just noise.

It’s always interesting how the loudest critics seem more invested in tearing things down than actually offering solutions. If Reabold was as hopeless as you make out, why are you still here? Surely you’d move on instead of spending all this time obsessing over a "lost cause."

The idea that raising funds is some kind of red flag ignores how exploration companies operate. Capital is raised to move projects forward—that’s normal, not shady. The fact institutional investors still back Reabold shows there’s belief in its assets and plans.

As for the share price, anyone who understands AIM knows these projects take time. The focus is on building value through progress, not reacting to short-term dips. West Newton alone has massive potential, and strategic moves like increasing stakes in Rathlin show clear intent.

Calling the directors crooks without evidence says more about your motives than theirs. Reabold is subject to regulations, audits, and scrutiny like any AIM-listed company. Throwing around accusations doesn’t change that.

If you’re still holding shares despite all this, then maybe you see the same potential others do—just admit it. Let’s focus on facts and realistic expectations instead of repeating the same negativity over and over.

It’s always interesting how the loudest critics seem more invested in tearing things down than actually offering solutions. If Reabold was as hopeless as you make out, why are you still here? Surely you’d move on instead of spending all this time obsessing over a "lost cause."

The idea that raising funds is some kind of red flag ignores how exploration companies operate. Capital is raised to move projects forward—that’s normal, not shady. The fact institutional investors still back Reabold shows there’s belief in its assets and plans.

As for the share price, anyone who understands AIM knows these projects take time. The focus is on building value through progress, not reacting to short-term dips. West Newton alone has massive potential, and strategic moves like increasing stakes in Rathlin show clear intent.

Calling the directors crooks without evidence says more about your motives than theirs. Reabold is subject to regulations, audits, and scrutiny like any AIM-listed company. Throwing around accusations doesn’t change that.

If you’re still holding shares despite all this, then maybe you see the same potential others do—just admit it. Let’s focus on facts and realistic expectations instead of repeating the same negativity over and over.

SP being low isn’t a reflection of dishonesty from the CEOs but rather the challenging market conditions for junior oil and gas companies in the UK. Regulatory hurdles, political uncertainties, and the broader sentiment around fossil fuel investments have all contributed to depressed valuations across the sector, not just Reabold. It’s important to separate sector-wide trends from company-specific performance.

Reabold’s co-CEOs are heavily invested in the company’s success, holding significant equity stakes. Their ownership aligns their interests with shareholders, as they only benefit when the company performs. Accusations like 'why aren’t they buying more?' ignore the reality that they already have meaningful exposure and don’t need to prove their commitment by continually purchasing shares, especially when they’re focused on advancing the business.

As for investors, many are understandably cautious in the current environment, but that caution presents an opportunity. The discounted share price is precisely why strategic investors or long-term holders might consider accumulating. It’s not about blind faith—it’s about understanding the potential value of the assets once hurdles are cleared.

The reality is, the CEOs and Reabold are playing the long game, which involves patience, strategy, and resilience. Those who believe in the value of West Newton and other projects understand that progress takes time, especially in a sector as complex as oil and gas.

Ha ha ha

Jokers, always easy to ridicule without offering substance, but the point stands you silly boys, broader market conditions do impact share prices, especially for small-cap energy companies like Reabold. This sector is notoriously cyclical, with sentiment heavily influenced by external factors like geopolitical uncertainty, energy policy shifts, and market volatility, none of which are unique to Reabold.

What really matters is the underlying potential of the company’s assets and strategy. Reabold has strategically increased its stake in Rathlin Energy, strengthened its position in West Newton, and maintained focus on advancing projects with long-term value. Dismissing this progress as 'bullcrap' suggests a lack of understanding of the complex nature of energy investments.

Reabold’s assets and strategy aren’t speculative; they’re grounded in the future need for domestic energy security, especially as the UK navigates its energy transition. Short-term price fluctuations don’t erase the intrinsic value of the projects underway. Instead of snide remarks, perhaps the focus should shift to evaluating the broader energy market trends and how Reabold is positioning itself to capitalise on!

Focusing solely on the historical share price without context oversimplifies the situation. The last five years have been challenging for the global energy sector, particularly small-cap exploration companies, with significant headwinds from the COVID-19 pandemic, fluctuating oil and gas prices, and increasing regulatory hurdles. Despite these challenges, Reabold has continued to advance its portfolio and increase its stake in key assets, such as Rathlin Energy, which has substantial upside potential in projects like West Newton.

The question about funding is easily answered: Reabold raises capital through equity financing to fund its projects, a common practice for exploration and development companies. These investments are made to de-risk assets and pave the way for future profitability. Projects like West Newton are at the cusp of delivering long-term value, with significant steps taken to secure environmental permits and progress the development program. These are not 'lost causes,' but rather calculated plays in a high-risk, high-reward sector.

The share price alone does not define the company’s potential or the progress being made on its assets. As with any early-stage exploration company, patience is key. When the projects reach their full potential, the returns could far outweigh the current market valuation. Instead of focusing on past performance, look to the future and consider the strategic groundwork Reabold is laying to deliver shareholder value in the long run

Look, Reabold buying more of Rathlin isn’t a bailout as some might suggest. It’s a smart strategic move. They’re taking more control over a key asset with a lot of upside potential, especially in the current market. The West Newton project is a long-term play, and by increasing their stake, they’re working to de-risk it and set themselves up for bigger returns down the road.

A company like Reabold doesn’t make decisions like this lightly. They’re securing their position, not just hanging on for the ride. Sure, they’ve faced challenges, but this is a chance to bring more value from a project that still has plenty of life in it.

So rather than focusing on negative assumptions or short-term thinking, it’s worth seeing the bigger picture. Reabold isn’t stuck, they’re taking action and positioning themselves for future success. Those who see the value now might end up benefiting from it later.

Institutional ownership changes are being misrepresented here. A reduction in institutional holdings doesn’t automatically signal declining confidence. Institutions frequently adjust their portfolios due to broader market factors, such as sector trends, ESG pressures, or liquidity needs, rather than concerns about a single company. In the energy sector, many institutions have shifted toward renewables for strategic reasons unrelated to Reabold's specific potential. Moreover, Reabold still maintains a solid base of retail investors who see long-term value and growth prospects, demonstrating confidence in the company's direction.

Reabold’s focus on advancing key projects like West Newton and increasing its stake in Rathlin Energy shows real progress. The company's ability to adapt in challenging market conditions highlights its resilience and commitment. Claims of "massive selling" ignore the broader context of institutional strategies and fail to account for Reabold's consistent efforts to de-risk its assets and position itself for future success. Long-term investors understand that this is about progress, not short-term fluctuations in ownership percentages.

Calling Reabold a 'lifestyle company' dismisses the real progress being made. Over the years, Reabold has increased its stakes in strategic assets like Rathlin Energy, expanded its portfolio, and continued advancing projects in challenging regulatory and political environments. These are not the actions of a company 'dragging things out'—they’re steps toward de-risking and monetizing assets for long-term growth.

Instead of focusing on baseless accusations, let’s consider the facts: Reabold has navigated turbulent markets, strengthened its position in key projects, and provided regular updates to its investors. For those who understand the challenges of the energy sector, Reabold represents a calculated play on the future of UK gas, not a 'con.' Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but sweeping generalizations and personal attacks add no value to the discussion

Claim about the share price dropping to sub-0.03p by the New Year is purely speculative fearmongering. It ignores several fundamental aspects that underpin Reabold’s potential. The company is actively working on high-value projects like West Newton, which has significant gas potential in a market that increasingly values domestic energy security. With a fully funded work program and no debt, Reabold is in a much stronger position than this narrative suggests.

Moreover, the recent increase in Reabold’s stake in Rathlin Energy allows it greater control over the development of its assets, which could significantly enhance shareholder value. Any perceived share price decline at this stage reflects broader market conditions, not the underlying potential of the company’s assets or strategy

Claiming West Newton is destined for failure ignores the significant progress made and the strategic value of the project. West Newton has already demonstrated its viability through multiple wells with hydrocarbons discovered, and ongoing work aims to further derisk its development.

Energy projects, particularly in the UK, face scrutiny and regulatory hurdles, but this does not equate to failure. Reabold’s increased stake in Rathlin and their commitment to advancing West Newton show confidence in its long-term potential. If West Newton truly lacked prospects, why would the company continue investing resources and maintaining stakeholder confidence? Success in this industry is measured over years, not weeks, and the foundations for profitability are being laid.

It’s easy to sit back and criticize, but those with a deeper understanding of energy sector dynamics can see the significant upside if West Newton progresses as planned.

Calling someone an 'apologist' for presenting balanced views shows a lack of real arguments. The Reabold BoD has faced industry-wide challenges head-on, securing strategic acquisitions like Rathlin's increased stake and focusing on de-risking key assets like West Newton. These are not the actions of a complacent or incompetent team but of one navigating a volatile market with determination.

Criticism without context is easy. Look at the facts: Reabold has no debt, a clear work program, and access to promising resources in the PEDL183 license. Their decisions align with long-term shareholder value, not short-term appeasement. Throwing around accusations without substance does nothing to undermine their actual progress or credibility