Member Info for Persimmone

Winny,

Come on old boy

I'll keep buying as a bounce eventually comes and a re-rate follows on decent news SCGL style

Winny

Come of girls you've got a new sheriff in town

I support RBD totally

Buy for me

All crooks the lot of you

It's why people like me who actually own 1% give a f00k to respond to the short sellers campaigning

You got me to deal with lads

I'm the new Sheriff

Monimonan = Persi = all Aliases

Own big Winny con right lads 💯✅

"According to our point of view, it is necessary to extract this natural resource to convert it into a fuel that aids decarbonization. It doesn't solve it entirely, but it helps, which is LN Energy. While awaiting the opinion of the National Environmental Impact Assessment Commission, the project by the American company LN Energy can rely on the authorization from the Ministry's Dams Office. In 2010, the Ministry of the Environment had already given the green light to the old project, which was later rejected by the Environmental Impact Assessment Commission. Now that the facility has been downsized, the company has changed, and the technology has been upgraded, a new approval has been granted, subject to the approval of an integrated monitoring plan to protect the Bomba reservoir. Even millimetric ground subsidence must be recorded, with biannual certifications at the expense of ACEA. If subsidence exceeds 25-30 mm, all extraction activities must be temporarily or permanently suspended.

Francesco Di Luca, the manager of the Monte Pallano mining site, expressed satisfaction, emphasizing that the company is fully aware of the fragility of the territory. The gas is extracted at a very slow rate over a 20-year period, after which activities will cease, and what are known as mine closures will be implemented. The subsidence will then be stabilized, and the site will be permanently sealed after 20 years of production. There is no injection of CO2 or other molecules into the subsoil. In this, we agree with Professor Damiani that such injection activities are absolutely not viable."

You’re entitled to your opinion but branding Reabold Resources as a "lifestyle company" completely dismisses the tangible progress and investments they’ve made. Over the years Reabold has strategically deployed capital into multiple upstream oil and gas projects with proven potential such as West Newton, Victory and California assets. These aren’t speculative ventures—they’re assets with clear operational milestones and development plans.

As for the joint CEOs, having two leaders ensures diverse expertise and accountability especially in a complex industry like oil and gas. The claim they’re just drawing substantial incomes without delivering results overlooks the fact that Reabold is primarily an asset-backed investment vehicle. The value of its shares is directly tied to the progress of the projects it invests in and the CEOs’ focus has always been on creating shareholder value through these projects.

Calling it a "lifestyle company" based on assumptions is misleading. Shareholders invest in oil and gas juniors knowing the inherent risks and the long-term nature of exploration and development. Companies like Reabold are doing exactly what they’re supposed to: building a diversified portfolio and progressing toward commercial success.

In this sector patience is key. Immediate profits aren’t the goal; delivering long-term value through developed and producing assets is. Instead of perpetuating negativity why not acknowledge the potential these projects hold?

If you’re basing your views on rumors and speculation, you’re missing the bigger picture. Projects like Colle Santo aren’t built overnight and anyone with experience in this industry knows delays or challenges are part of the process. Jumping to conclusions about refusal or failure without evidence only serves the agenda of those looking to profit from panic.

Instead of focusing on negativity, why not consider the fundamentals? Colle Santo is a significant project with long-term potential, and temporary setbacks, if they even exist, don’t erase that value. The company has put in the work to advance this project strategically and short-term noise doesn’t change the bigger picture.

If your goal is to sow doubt, you might succeed with a few, but the facts and progress will always outweigh baseless rumors. Investors who understand the value here won’t be swayed by fearmongering or speculation. Patience pays off, and it’s clear the potential for Colle Santo is far from “unfortunate” as you claim.

the fact is, it’s not about one asset or one project—it’s about a long-term strategy. wressle did exactly what it was supposed to do, delivering production and cash flow while building a foundation for further growth. as for west newton, it’s still a major untapped asset with potential that’s far from being fully realised. just because the market hasn’t fully recognised that yet doesn’t mean it won’t pay off in the future.

focusing on short-term share price movements ignores the bigger picture of ongoing development. sure, there’s volatility, but that’s the nature of the sector. the company isn’t just “******* in the wind” as some might say, it’s actively working on improving its assets and positioning itself for the long haul. the true value of these projects will become clearer as they evolve, and many investors understand that, which is why they’re holding firm.

the market might be down now, but that doesn’t mean the opportunity’s gone. far from it. the clever money isn’t leaving, they’re just taking a more patient, strategic approach. the potential is still there, and it will take time for the value to be fully realised.

It’s easy to criticize without looking at the bigger picture. Sure, costs and profits need to balance, but companies in this sector reinvest heavily into projects to build long-term value. This isn’t about instant results; it’s about setting up for future returns. Wressle has already proven its worth by delivering strong production and outperforming expectations. That success helps fund further development, which is how this industry works – steady progress over time.

The claim about directors is an old argument that doesn’t stand up. These projects take time and effort to deliver results, and no one is getting paid for doing nothing. It’s a long-term game, and while there are risks, dismissing everything as “jam tomorrow” ignores the progress already made and the potential still to come.

The parrot analogy might sound clever, but it doesn’t reflect reality. The assets are far from dead, and further development will only add value. Negativity like this often comes from impatience or a focus on short-term noise. For those taking a longer view, the company is in a far stronger position than this suggests.

That’s a pretty short-sighted take on things. Sure, the Oklahoma basin is mature, but that doesn’t mean all the potential is gone. Stripper wells still have value, especially when they’re managed efficiently and costs are kept under control. These wells can provide steady production over time, and in an era of high oil prices or operational improvements, they’re far from useless.

Calling them "just stripper wells" ignores the fact that smaller, consistent outputs can still be very profitable, particularly in a portfolio that’s diversified. It’s not about hitting home runs with every well, it’s about maximizing value from existing resources and building long-term sustainability. Writing them off completely shows a lack of understanding of how companies leverage mature fields for steady returns.

Winny and Shore,

Lmfao not a great deal to tear apart.

Onwards and upwards.

Nice try with Funding FUD.

Lucky I'm the new Sheriff in town.

Well done all.

Winny, Shore Capital too,

It’s easy to jump to conclusions when you’re only looking at part of the picture. Just because the RNS didn’t dive into every detail about future costs or flow rates doesn’t mean something’s being hidden. Companies often hold back on specifics until they’re certain about the data. West Newton is still a work in progress, and using a vacuum pump at Taylor-1 is a standard industry method to help optimize flow. It’s not a sign of failure, but a step toward getting the most out of the well.

As for the flow rates at Andrews, early production numbers aren’t the whole story. These wells are still being worked on, and initial figures are often conservative while operators figure out how to optimize production. It’s a long process, and rushing to conclusions about success or failure based on early numbers isn’t how the oil and gas industry works.

The company isn’t just sitting on its hands here. Taking a measured approach rather than hyping things up with incomplete or premature data is actually a good sign. It shows there’s a focus on delivering real results instead of trying to create short-term excitement. A lot of noise can be made about these early challenges, but that doesn’t mean they won’t be overcome.

Big projects like this take time, and small steps today can lead to much bigger results down the line. Instead of focusing on what’s not perfect right now, it’s worth keeping an eye on the bigger picture and how these assets are being developed.

Winny,

You're really clutching at straws here. No flow rates for Andrews or Wressle? That’s because they’re early in operations and the company doesn’t throw out untested numbers. It’s already been confirmed that Andrews wells are generating revenue and Wressle’s performance has been solid for ages with no need to keep repeating it in every update.

As for Moccasin, co-mingling zones is standard practice in the industry. It’s a smart way to get the most out of the well, not some sign of low flow expectations.

And royalties? The revenue is already coming in. Just because they didn’t slap a dollar sign on it this time doesn’t mean it’s not significant. You’re overthinking “pleasing” as it’s clearly positive.

Honestly, it’s like you’re looking for issues that aren’t there. The RNS shows progress and solid financial footing but I guess that doesn’t suit your narrative.

Tw idiots galore

Fear Uncertainty and Doubt huh?

Bunch of shorting scum

Some solid news confirming another no thanks to desperate short sellers.

Well done Team.

Yes for real ... No Sh Sherlock ugh

I'm gonna have to sign up to X for a chinwag.... Ugh really....

I'm getting insomnia right now

Inbox open here too

Dude!

I don't have X

I'm trying to get to sleep zzzzzz

Night night dude.

Please stop embarrassing yourself

Your motives are certainly not of the "positive" supportive kind.

Try and get a goodnights sleep. Be kind dude.

Goodnight dude

It's no good voicing a defence

Not a single positive or constructive comment in all your online presence

Sleep well