RE: Back to a few facts7 Jan 2025 20:58
Oh Winny Girls,
It seems you're focusing more on the negativity than the actual fundamentals. Sentiment certainly plays a role, but successful companies are driven by the underlying value they create. As for the blog, people have different perspectives, but questioning assets, cash flow, and strategic plans based on inconsistencies might reflect a lack of understanding of how the company operates in a high-risk sector like oil and gas.
You mention "ramped RNSs" and "leaked placings," but these often happen in volatile markets, and companies need to navigate that reality. The criticism about transparency and inflated salaries seems like a broad generalisation, without context or specifics, it's hard to take that seriously.
Regarding long-term holders selling, that's natural in any market. If a stock doesn’t align with someone's strategy or risk tolerance, they move on. But I’d argue those who are still invested see something others don’t, a long-term potential that can’t be dismissed based on short-term noise.
And as for the likes of Winnifrith and RNSTranslator, it’s always easy to call them "wise" from the sidelines. But real investors weigh facts and figures, not just the latest headlines.