We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=benefits+to+companies+institutional+ownership
Cheers,
per ardua ad astra
“They know the bond market as well as anyone.”
——-
Indeed. Why do you suppose they advocated this route and the RCF in the first place then?
Regards,
per ardua ad astra
“Remember delusion sustains illusion”
——-
Says the guy pretending to be someone he’s not?
Just sayin’
per ardua ad astra
Morning, Mazda-babe. Dunno about ramper but... I’ve just bought real shares on the opening bell for the first time in years — if that tells you anything.
Cheers,
per ardua ad astra
Good morning, Cranleigh. Much as I like the idea of a 50% finance risk (and the uplift completion should entail), can we fairly only ascribe 20% to market when, ADM and Wilmer aside, there’s not too many established large-scale users/distributors on the TorP roll-call?
Regards,
per ardua ad astra
Anyone lauding the establishment of a freeport on Teesside care to elucidate to this particular thicko, exactly how it will benefit Sirius?
Many thanks,
per ardua ad astra
Stick a selfie up, jessell. Then everyone can see.
per ardua ad astra
Spot on, Myo. What a fraud.
per ardua ad astra
Good job we’re not relying on contributions to inform and delight though, eh John?
You seem to offer little more than criticism of others’ contributions and, for some peculiar reason strangely believe anyone gives a fig about how many shares you own. Top contributions! #******
per ardua ad astra
Admin aren’t routinely patrolling the board, tuckupp. Unaware of how powerful a community can be (rather ironic on a Sirius Minerals board), it is the small minded bigots unable to tolerate anything that isn’t of immediate interest to themselves that are the real issue.
per ardua ad astra
Members (ooh... you are a wag), why have you firstly cut and pasted a Motley Fool article without crediting the author, and by doing so , somewhat duplicitously inferred the thoughts were your own? And secondly a selective cut and paste really is poor form when you do so only to support your Machiavellian agenda. Entirely unsurprisingly you seem to have omitted the conclusion posited by Roland Head in the closing paragraph. A conclusion that finds:
“The firm’s own projections give the project a net present value of 68p. This represents the value today of future cash profits. AT15P, THE SHARE PRICE SHOULD PROVIDE AN ATTRACTIVE MARGIN OF SAFETY (my caps).
If I wanted to invest in Sirius, I’d consider buying some at this level. But I’d only do this with money I could afford to lose and wouldn’t need for at least five years.”
Talking your book and hoping to mislead others into doing likewise? What a charmer! No wonder people seem to have taken a dislike to you.
per ardua ad astra
Hiya, John. That link is for the convertibles issued at ST1. They’ve now been exchanged into the 2027 expiry convertibles issued in part 1 of ST2 in May. The corporate bonds that are currently being hawked around the market are a different entity entirely. Apart from the fact they will command a heavy coupon (institutions are far more risk averse than you or, I) there’s not much information too chew on at the mo’.
Cheers,
per ardua ad astra
“perhaps this would calm nerves”
——-
So would some research. Try it, is my suggestion.
per ardua ad astra
per ardua ad astra
“Myosotis is dangerous type of poster.”
——-
No he’s not. Danger only lurks in being lazy, slow witted or dim enough to take everything you read at face value, whilst at the same time distinctly lacking the ability to discern anything of real value and take it on its own merit. Distill that with those old adversaries; fear and greed, and you have a heady mix ready to slap the under informed, under researched and under equipped smartly around the chops.
Take a look at your own shortcomings.
per ardua ad astra
“Would you care to elaborate on the situation and poster?”
——-
It’s all Greek to me. Well... the swimming pool shaped part anyway.
Cheers,
per ardua ad astra
“anybody that obsesses about the mine ,marvels at the engineering of the project is wasting their time if the object is to be a successful investor”
——-
Whilst instinctively inclined to concur, in this instance - and somewhat paradoxically - looking to what is actually developing on the ground could very well lead those feeling unsettled now to becoming successful investors in the years ahead.
The share price is undoubtedly under pressure. And there’s every chance that may remain the case for a while yet. However (there’s always a however), the very cause of that pressure - namely the component parts of ST2, should also afford a degree of comfort and succour also.
Put it this way, whilst disappointment and disaffection are currently the order of the day, it is the willingness to countenance such a reaction in his investors, that should demonstrate to any who may have doubted it, Fraser will do WHATEVER it takes to drag salt to the surface from the guts of North Yorkshire. As such, worries currently impacting on price, such as the need to get the bonds away, should be ameliorated.
Granted, investors in this company may never actually see the full return they had hoped for. The converse is that the current price - which to my mind at least, reflects perhaps over exaggerated concerns - certainly does not reflect the fact this mine will be built. And over-played Gina concerns aside, current shareholders are extremely likely to enjoy a share in that.
One day.
Regards,
per ardua ad astra
“it's been used for decades”
—- —
Natch. He was, however (as far as I am aware), the first key executive to apply it to any future Sirius share price trajectory.
per ardua ad astra
... all three of us!
“How embarrassing that term was used during questioning at the AGM”
——-
Why? It was coined by Fraser himself, and a central component of his sales pitch.
per ardua ad astra
per ardua ad astra
per ardua ad astra
A good morning to you too, Thornback - and many thanks for your kind words also.
Regards,
per ardua ad astra