Member Info for Peoplepower1

To create loads and loads of doubt and confusion about Valereum for your own amusement.

4 years you've been doing this with nearly 60 pages of posts only on Valereum because it amuses you.

Another nanoscale daily trading volume today of 217,000 shares from 488m shares in issue.

Looks like shareholders are holding onto their Valereum shares.

Yet another tactic is to create loads and loads of doubt and confusion about Valereum.

GG has been doing this for four years and nearly 60 pages of posts. He does it because it amuses him.

The founder of the new Corporate Adviser has more than 20 years of prior experience with Zeus.

And as I said before, I think Valereum bought GSX, to make it a total AI driven tokenisation RWA platform.

To do this, Valereum has to show it is capable of doing this elsewhere, hence, the EL Salvador set up because this was the cheapest way to show Valereum are capable of doing it and so get the regulatory approval needed for GSX.

The add on bits that Valereum buy or invest in or have MOUs are all to add to its capabilities of achieving their end goal for GSX, a total AI driven tokenisation platform with regulatory approval.

I think when they get regulatory approval to run GSX as a total AI driven tokenised RWA platform, then, this will also be licensed globally because as far as I know there are no total AI driven tokenisation RWA platforms.

I think this may be why QGP became involved to provide the means for Valereum to achieve their end goal with GSX as the first total AI driven tokenised RWA platform with regulatory approval.

Plus the nanoscale daily trading volumes mean very few shareholders are selling their Valereum shares.

Another tactic is to run down anyone who disagrees with them.

$280m in total held by Valereum

You see what I mean by tactics and asking questions, questions, questions.

$280m in total held by Valereum.

This is one of the tactics they use ask questions, questions, questions.

The new Corporate Adviser must do due diligence on the assets for Aquis otherwise Valereum wouldn't have been allowed to come back on Aquis.

GG has been here for 4 years running down Valereum and only Valereum with nearly 60 pages of posts only on Valereum. He finds it amusing and will keep doing it for another 4 years and probably more.

No, it's not double counting.

It's huge money $280m.

Yes they are. The new Corporate Adviser must do due diligence for this for Aquis.

Valereum wouldn't have been able to come back onto the Aquis market without this.

Valereum are the legal, beneficial owners of the MTNs so already have $200m on Valereum's balance sheet

Valereum got more interest paid than agreed originally i.e. $80m instead of I think it was $50m and the $200m on maturity.

The new Corporate Adviser will have helped Valereum agree better terms. The founder of the new Corporate Adviser has 20 years prior experience with Zeus so a good add on for Valereum.

Valereum have to be the legal beneficial owners of the MTNs to get the $80m over 5 years of interest paid to them and to get the maturity value of $200m at the end of 5 years.

$280m in total.

Sold 49.9% of Valereum for $280m in total is not stock dilution.

It's getting the funds to grow the business.

With nanoscale daily trading volumes like 311,00 shares now for today out of 488m shares in issue is evidence and proof that the majority of shareholders are holding on to their Valereum shares.

Even when it was 250m shares in issue, a 256,000 daily trading volume is still nanoscale.

Institutions need huge daily trading volumes to buy shares.

Take today's trading volume of about 256,000 shares with 488m shares in issue.

As I said, it's nanoscale.

Unfortunately, daily trading volume for Valereum shares is nanoscale.

Daily trading volumes need to be much higher for Institutions to buy.

This is why Institutions can 't buy Valereum shares in millions because they're not available in such huge amounts.

Another reason for Valereum wanting to move to Nasdaq, NYSE or even the London Stock Exchange.

Glad to hear it.

It's still an extremely illiquid share, hence, the low trading volumes daily.

No it doesn't work that way, trying to buy large amounts of these shares ends up costing double the price because it's so difficult to buy and sell these shares in such large amounts.

The same with selling such large amounts, you'd only get half the price for them.

As I said it's an extremely illiquid share, hence, the low trading volumes daily.

It's extremely difficult to buy and sell large amount of shares i.e. 100,000 shares and over.

Hence the majority of small trades which are much less than 100,000.