Member Info for Pdub

Strider do you have anything constructive to say or are you going to spend all day making noise?

Alfa's contributions to this bb, and possibly to the company, have been immense. If you think you can do better then why don't you?

I am very grateful to Alfa for his hard work and insights into the vanadium space. You offer me nothing.

Strider a pity you are singing that same old same old bulletin board police rubbish.

I have also been here a long time, possibly longer than you. I have invested here for one reason only - I had confidence that Fortune Mojapelo had the ability to take this company forward and deliver to those shareholders with enough patience. I have repeated that many times on this bb and have been very consistent on that score.

Having invested what was for me a large proportion of my savings in this company there is no way on this planet that I was going to let negative posters (and on some occasions that may have included you) try to damage my investment without challenging their nonsense. To those that complain about me I say two things:

1. Don't post here if you don't want a response. ie if you can't take the heat then get out of the kitchen.
2. Everything I said about the potential for investors in this company has been delivered, and some quite frankly! Therefore to send the negative posters packing I feel absolutely vindicated. And if some want to continue their negativity on this bb then expect me to let them have it with both barrels.

I will defend my investment and I don't care what the derampers or negative posters think about it. I fact l am quite enjoying it. Let's face it anyone attacking a share with the stonkingly good fundamentals that BMN has is easy prey. And I and a few others are waiting.

Bb police ... What a joke.

So move along there ... Let's be 'avin' you ... You can't leave that negative post here sir ...

All my own opinion.

Regards. Pdub.

Strider I do wish you well in that venture. If it works for you that's great.

However my chosen investment policy has worked rather well for me already. I expect that to continue with BMN for years to come. When dividends are paid on top even better.

As far as what Alfa does I am very grateful for the time and effort that he puts in to try to at least reduce some of the advantage that the mms have over pi's.

Problem with that Strider is that if standard TA is so reliable then why aren't you a multi millionaire sunning yourself on your own private island? That puzzles me.

I will stick with the WB method of find a good company, invest and have the patience to stick with it.

Bnzltn I have been honest with you in stating that I am nit an expert. I am qualified by virtue of a Geology degree but I am not an oil engineer noir do I work in the oil industry.

However Alan is an expert in this field, far more than you or I. Here is an answer that he gave to this question some time ago. Whether or not you accept this us up to you. However you will need to explain why you are better qualified than a professional in the field.

"Now I already covered the gas question in a post dated 17th October 2018 titled RE: All that Gas.

The key passage is “Should the gas produced start to exceed the capacity of the generator” No oil company is going to plan for 100% i.e. what you expect is what you get…..you always factor in a contingency….150-200%. So I don’t think we shall see gas volumes anywhere near what is quoted, which means higher oil flow rates. And what if they actually strike it rich with respect to gas….well add another modular gas generator to upgrade your capacity. Simple as that..increase your output 4 fold at 100% gas rate and all for an extra 8dBA of noise.

In the manufacturers own spec sheet they state “Modular unit design allows plant capacity to be easily scaled up or down.” The generator comes preassembled in something very similar to a Maersk sea freight container. Delivered on a flat bed truck and spotted using a crane prior to being hooked up to the well / grid."

That seems to confirm what I told you earlier. Now I am not in the habit of continually answering the same question over and over again. You have your answer,. That's it.

Good night.

ps Alan I hope you do not mind my use of your posts. Apologies if any offence caused. Regards. Pdub.

Actually I did. But I am no more an expert than you. Therefore you are entitled not to like my answer but that doesn't make it wrong.

Ja51 it is you that is the joke. What a sad life you must lead.

I doubt you are invested yet you spend your time desperately trying to twist and misrepresent every tiny piece of info you can lay your hands on. When your questions are firmly dealt with you ignore the answers, not even having the courtesy to acknowledge the time taken to deal with your 'issues'.

I would be easy to assume you are simply bored, but isn't it the reality that you have a definite agenda against the development of Brockham?

Fortunately the world moves on and you will fail to stop it. And am delighted by that prospect.

Just my opinion of course.

bnzltn I an no expert but can read as well as you. It has been posted on here that these systems are modular and can be quickly added to if increased capacity is required.

If equipment is rented or leased then you don't need to have additional capacity until needed, particularly if extra units are available off the shelf. Cost saving.

Seems logical to me.

Just my opinion of course but sometimes the obvious and simple answer is the correct one.

Yes. Reported all his misleading posts. Perhaps others may take similar action.

I hope Alan2017 does not mind me reposting this from Wednesday in answer to the obvious troll.

"So what exactly is “Brockham - Annual Average Offtake” Well lets take a look at other examples of the term “Average Annual”

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/523935/response/1277768/attach/5/brockprodconsred.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1

Annual average daily traffic, abbreviated AADT, is a measure used primarily in transportation planning, transportation engineering and retail location selection. Traditionally, it is the total volume of vehicle traffic of a highway or road for a year divided by 365 days.

Average annual rainfall for a place is generally calculated by averaging the last 30 years of annual rainfall. Annual rainfall is the sum of daily rainfall, that can be calculated from rain gauge records.

So it’s the daily sum added up over the year and then averaged out. Well that makes sense. But you don’t have the exact same number of cars every day?!?! Loooooong sigh.

So all the posters trying to sow seeds of doubt with Angus can only flow 300bopd is rubbish. The OGA would never shackle an oil company with such a low volume.

You do not produce 24/7 during any type of well test. You want to see how the reservoir responds to periods of flow and subsequent periods of the well being shut in. Rather like squeezing a ballon, does it return to its previous shape (reservoir pressure builds up again to before test) or does the ballon retain its new squeezed shape (reservoir pressure declined and cannot reinstate the ballots original form).

The testing schedule as set by the OGA gives a specific timeline for the period for production testing, analysing data and producing the results. This is done so companies just don’t well test for ever, by doing so produce as if they had a licence (UKOG) and circumnavigate protocols. The documentation from the OGA is standard and by stating an overall production limit also acts to encourage the Oil Company to be efficient with the test and to progress it to the next stage in an efficient manner . After all its in the national interest to continually replace depleted wells / fields with new ones. I believe folk would not be as concerned with the Angus production test if the same amount of effort had gone in to researching the UKOG documentation. You will find a lot of similarities with constraints.

So yes Angus can flow more than 300bopd in a single day….otherwise why spend the extra rental money on those super large tanks you see at Brockham?!?! Angus will look to exceed the 1,365bopd flow rates observed from HH KL3 and KL4 2016 test."

Haha knutsfordnotary please don't do that. It only hurts when I laugh. That was a funny line "advert for appendectomy". Support appreciated though!

Regards. Pdub.

Coffeecups I am sure in real life you are a pleasant individual so please stop behaving like a thug and a bully on this bb. I am very happy to have a civil discourse but you clearly don't want that. I respect your wishes.

Regards. Pdub.

Strider it's all a question of timescale.

End of
2016 sp 1.86p
2017 sp 8.5p
2018 sp 38.75p
2019 sp ?????

Yes I stand by every word.

Great company
Great resources
Great market dynamics
Great business plan
Great future
Great ROI

Looking like a great 2019

Happy New Year to you.

Just my opinion.

Regards. Pdub.

CC still as rude as ever. That's ok. We all have our own style.

Good luck with your investments in 2019.

Regards. Pdub.

Thanks Sanchez / Alfa. All kicked off late Sunday night. First visit to hospital 6pm New Years Eve. Surgery New Years Day. Home Friday evening.

Odstock Hospital, Salisbury you are all brilliant. Thank you.

Regards. Pdub.

Great post Alfa.

Enjoy your weekend gkb47.

And it's Pdub.

Thanks kevkan, just glad to have got through the last week. The BB was a great distraction from my health issues during that time. Just trying to give something back.

Regards. Pdub.

Apologies for trying to defend your investment gkb47.

IH forgive me but I believe you have completely missed the point.

No one denies your right to post on any BB that you choose and I am sure you do. Personally I only post on BBs where I am invested and have skin in the game.

The reaction to your posts on BMN BB is because many posters here are very well researched LTHs who have a great depth of knowledge about the company, vanadium and the vanadium market. ie they know what they are doing. Many here consider BMN to be one of those rare shares that actually does break the mould of the AIM fast rise / fast fall scenario, simply because the evidence points to that.

I fully understand why visitors to this BB assume the usual ups and downs of AIM shares will definitely apply here, and of course many try to exploit that by trying to cast doubt on the BB to further encourage any falls. It is a pattern of behaviour that any seasoned contributor / reader of LSE will have seen repeatedly. However those visitors have been misreading the BMN situation and over the last two years have been wrong wrong wrong.

Given the imbalance of knowledge between these seasonal visitors and the LTHs on this BB it should come as no surprise that such people are suitably despatched with a flea in their ear for trying to "teach their granny to suck eggs"! You call it abuse ... but remember it is only a response to their own poorly informed posts.

This company has already made many of its LTH s quite wealthy. In my opinion the evidence suggests that the phenomenal growth of the company and the meteoric rise in the share price seems set to continue. I, like many here, choose to keep my profit invested for that reason, and I hope that those more recent investors who have also recognised the potential of this company and have the patience to hold will share the pleasure of a significant ROI.

Thus there really is no need for you to advise this BB of the following:

"But (as is the warning on all investments) - past success is NO guarantee of possible future returrns."

We know. But thank you for your concern.

So I guess you can buy or not ... up to you. Personally BMN is a strong long term hold, topping up where possible.

All just my opinion.

Regards. Pdub.