Member Info for pawnsacrifice

pg 84 of the report gives it as an inclined drill with "Gold assays returned 2m@10,35g/t from 57m, 1m@43,00g/t from 64m and 16m@1,24g/t from 151m"

Take it you mean this one lucky?
https://contango-holdings-plc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/FINAL-NI-43-101-GARALO-Project.-Technical-Report.-March-15.-2021.pdf

Have never got through it all. Reading again now. Impressive and detailed report though. Is this the one our new poster wants us to discount? Seems unlikely many will imo, too professional and well put together.
Between that and reading the gold project update RNS,s since Dec tempted to take a few more before the geophysics results come in just worried the mm.s may find 11 trades in a week too excitable.
ATB,
pawn

and you're straight back to being personal. If you can't verify your "fact" that rampers are ludicrously claiming this will multibag soon then just apologise for making such a silly inflammatory comment. til then you're just pegged as a troll imho.

15 December 2020 RNS - Wheres the slippage?

Carl Esprey, Executive Director of Contango Holdings, said: "Garalo was acquired with the intention of bringing into production a small but highly profitable gold mine. The publication of this Report, which included both reinterpretation of historic data as well as information not previously incorporated in the historic 320,000-ounce figure, has made it clear that Garalo is significantly larger than first envisaged, with the potential to be a sizeable, multi-million-ounce standalone mine, rivalling some of our neighbours in this world class gold producing region.



"The resource quantum now being contemplated at Garalo suggest the Company should bypass the previously reported initial 10,000oz per annum development scenario, instead bringing a larger +30,000oz per annum heap leach operation onstream from the shallow oxides and providing Contango cashflow from Garalo in late 2021. With an estimated profitability of circa US$1,000oz at current gold prices, this would enable not only capital returns to shareholders potentially as early as 2022, but also fund a comprehensive exploration campaign focussed on realising the asset's multi-million ounce potential.



"The Contango in-country team is continuing with detailed core re-logging and field geological and structural mapping and will shortly initiate further tighter line-spacing airborne and radiometric surveys, ahead of fast-tracking a modest confirmatory drilling programme before progressing with the development. As previously reported, this expanded development case is expected to be funded through non-equity finance either via regional banks and / or royalty providers.

Already all answered you just keep ignoring the replies and moving on.
You're the one being personal honesty. verify this claim/accusation of yours..

"All the facts I posted can be checked and verified however all you’re talk of this will multibaging soon is just ludicrous wishful thinking"

I haven't seen any posts from "rampers" claiming this will multibag soon? Haven't seen many posts at all actually apart from today?
Odd comment imo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybC0d2BDc6A

Really think you should rewatch the latest vid interview HT.. Carl is not at all surprised at the market not taking their word for the resource being upgraded so much and goes on about it at length accepting they'll have to prove it up as they're doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybC0d2BDc6A

"We were told coking off take would take 45 days it’s already been 75 days"

No we were told they had to employ a mining engineer and then with the help of the chinese I believe they would pick an area to test and that from there it would take 45 days.
Last RNS they stated they were looking forward to updating on how negotiations were going at lubu too rather than ops so as said expecting things to be slow there as advised in the RNS's just don't agree on they're a scam is all.

but not sure you can effect the sp if thats your aim. Its pretty tightly held by seemingly patient holders hence the few trades and they have no need to raise given the plans for debt and royalty funding of the gold assets so little for short traders to work with.

Their Bitumen additive still looks very positive for future sales too imo.
Found this last night, carbon reduction given by using DCTA's additive sounds impressive and hopefully will get some attention in todays aspiring carbon neutral planet

Building green with nanotechnology
The results are out: Iterchimica and Directa Plus’ GiPave combines recycled plastic and nanotechnology to improve pavement performance across the board
June 23, 2021
https://www.worldhighways.com/feature/building-green-nanotechnology

You started it with "pawnface" gherkin. You just don't like it back.
If you're really after having them put out the info you want then you could try emailing and asking.
My email to info@blockenergy.co.uk was answered really quick yesterday so guess they're manning it at the mo. Might be a good time to chew their ear so to speak?

Well I'm sorry gherkin but not everything's about you.

Because it wouldn't make any difference. They'd still have to have the 2nd gm to fulfil their obligations re aim regs.
They're not trying to convince the market of anything imho they're just getting hassled by the 5% crew.

All posted, thanks for the initial advice with IG scooby. Appreciated.

Had an email back from bloe. Its just an "x" in the against box. No mention was made of putting the amount of shares held on the form so presume they don't need that just the accompanying letter to your broker advising how many shares are held and stating how you want them voted as advised on here earlier.
As to the proxy you can either write "chairman" or leave blank.

re voting.
I've written the accompanying letter,downloaded the form and have started to fill it in. Its states I should just put an x in the "against" boxes which is fine but I can't find anywhere to put down how many shares I have. Is this something IG will take care of or am I missing something obvious?

Deferring drilling would also mean the £5.28 million raised in Dec was still in the accts ready to be raided by the concert party. Don't see how that could have been a good thing for fellow holders?

If Andrew Finch is willing to personally pay for the audit and for the boards time dealing with the distraction of two GM's in quick succession I have less trouble with it but somehow can't see that happening.

They're not politicians they're managers of a gas co. who are being hassles by a 5% holder.
Isn't their a rule about bringing gm's for spurious reasons? Pretty sure that'll end up being the best defense against this Andrew Finch person.

Makes them sound rather angry, thinking they know full well they're going to lose the first so are bent on making trouble.
See how it plays out but can't see many of their fellow investors being happy with them messing with their investment like this for long.

Not read the piece but is it only the Irish assets?
" who knew Griffiths had 50% of Theseus which meant he wouldn't be diluted on the Irish assets with prd raises?"