Member Info for pawnsacrifice

and 16 million followers when taking into account their players followers etc? That's a humungous amount to use to attract sponsors.

Non refundable does sound like a grant but no expert on eu grant procedures. Happy to see all the same and as you say good to be scaling up ops at Setcar.

Interesting, the egm called for Wed is to consider getting rid of our chairman and putting in a puppet for the 5%ers not for the wasting of £500k on an unwanted audit.
Is the oily one just un researched or have the concert party already given up on winning the first vote?

Yes but it wasn't a "bucket outing" was it? It was a placing at a premium whilst the share price was already at a 2 year + high and the markets reaction was to lift the stock another 50 percent in one quick move.

Placing RNS doesn't indicate any shortfall of funds coming in? It does list long lead items, strong growth in contracts going forwards and the need to forward pay for chips from new suppliers due to the worldwide shortage.

Background to and reasons for the
Fundraising
On 7 April 2021, the Company provided a trading update for the CyanConnode group for the year ended 31 March 2021 (FY21). This update confirmed that deployments had significantly increased and that record annual revenues of circa 2.5 times the previous financial period had been achieved. The key contributor to such growth was the shipment of 481,000 modules to new and existing customers in India, Thailand and the Nordics.

Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic has brought significant challenges, the CyanConnode group continues to make good progress against projects. Despite seeing a worldwide shortage of semiconductors, CyanConnode has taken steps to mitigate such shortages by purchasing components from alternative suppliers. However, in some cases it has become necessary to make advance payments to secure the supply of semiconductors used in the module manufacturing process.

Moving on up! Good to see the cash outflow dropping yr on yr and that wit the directors taking a fair wage too.
Like to see directors being well rewarded as revenue/cash position improves. Gives confidence they won't be lost to other firms just as they come good.

Can't see how CV can possibly stay. The 11th Aug statement had this at the bottom..
"For the reasons noted above, the non-conflicted directors reiterate their unanimous position"

Obviously one of the directors at least is considered "conflicted" then. Wonder which one?

Not a clue.
Think they've banned everyone who knew.

So.. from the Bloomberg news article..

Peter Young met with Jon Fitzpatrick (presumably the one working for Gneiss?) whilst Jon was a mergers and acquisitions advisor advising Rockrose and after that meeting Peter attempted to hurriedly buy a large amount of Rockrose shares offering well over the top for said shares the night before the co. was taken over and the shares tripled.
The broker Peter attempted to buy said shares from declined the trade stating suspicious circumstances/timing so Peter sued??
The broker sued back citing the meeting with Jon and the desperation of Peter to buy what were unloved shares with no known news pending but the case got nowhere as they could not get hold of Peters phone records which they needed for evidence against him?
Would have to say if only provisionally that it does leave the impression that Peter was quite fortunate that the judge would not allow his records to be opened and that if he's correct and it was all just "coincidence" it may have looked better for him today if they had been.

Smacks of desperation and a bit of anger/frustration I think. perhaps the concert party thought their past would go unchallenged/researched whilst questioning the past of the board?
All in all not a good showing on here the last few sessions imho, getting rid of AJW seems exceptionally low.
Still not long now hopefully they'll lose the first vote convincingly enough to give up on the 2nd and peeps can have their co. back.

Agree breezer was just surprised to see the statement at the bottom of the rns. I would have had them leave that out.

Yes enormous asset Lubu and just a bit of patience needed as they negotiate with the travel reluctant Chinese .
Good to see the movement last couple of days but still don't see our 2m oz 30k/yr goldmine being anywhere near fairly valued yet.

Report their posts V111JAS
This is libel and the post should be removed..
"Shareholders are seeking to promote the long-term success of the Company by resolving systemic corporate governance issues"

"The MOU-1 well has been completed and a follow-up drilling programme is under review.."

Think they could have worded that better. Sounds as if even mou-4 isn't a decision yet but that's PRD for you I guess. lol

Good to have a target for profitability and with a €4m cashburn last year leaving €7m in the bank maybe no need for a placing before its reached either. Not with today's news and the extra € .5m they're negotiating on top.

Yes seems fair enough really AJW, I was just peeved that I keep appearing to read the history just after its all been deleted again.
Can't be many days now before its too late for pi's to vote, those with nominee accts at least which I guess is most of us.

Expected news on a placing this morning not several low interest covid loans for expansion.
Happy of course, guess Fridays fall was just a savage test of the 200dma?

I think when they delete they delete the thread? May have that wrong but would explain a lot.
Good that these people are p1ssed enough to keep getting the truth about them deleted. Shows they have no defence against the truth.
LSE owners are pussies.

frazer lang. Why aren't we allowed to mention frazer lang?? Sounds like a monty python joke.

They're a secretive group of un named and hidden people who are working to bring more transparency to BLOE??? LOL