RE: RNS...31 May 2022 13:33
re calorific values am time constrained but you are correct they have reported on calorific value historically. I've found reports between 5300-6000+ online. ie:
We are very pleased to report that coal quality, in terms of both calorific value and ash content, is
exceeding management’s initial expectations when mining commenced. Both the raw mined and
processed coal has been extensively tested at our on-site laboratory and has returned values that
meet our customer’s requirements.
Recent results from our on-site laboratory have given encouraging calorific values for Mkomolo,
including 6,734 GCV (Gross Calorific Value in Kcal/Kg) on an air-dried basis, correlating with previous
results from December 2017. Additionally, and of particular note, is the energy value contained in our
raw coal fines material (material generally less than one sixteenth of an inch in size), recently testing
at 4,753 GCV on an as received basis"
Still say all these 2019 investors and before were flogging a dead horse. Trying to invest in a coal miner when they could only get $7/ton as posted by markettimer below. How was that ever going to work out well?
To be honest think a real market timer would buy for the potential bounce once the price of the commodity has gone through the roof not whilst it was on the floor.