Member Info for Pau1Oz

But slowing.

Although.... the destination is dated as 22nd... so thats last sundays destination....

Which spike? We're at/above every spike since April....

Then don't chase, calm ya pants, and they shall have value credited in due course. Both problems solved.

Well of course @IreneKrapp.... all numbers at this stage are guesstimates, and for most invested here by the very nature of that, will be erring to the positive side. The uncertainty is why SP is circa 3p, not £3...... obvs.

'MM's Hoovering shares' bares little resemblance to how the market actually works.
MM's don't have budget to hold anything. If they have a large buy or sell order to fill they adjust Sp and spread accordingly.... but it's because someone is looking to buy or sell.

Thats not what will happen unfortunately... it will be a different entity with the same brand name.

Well..... 'people close to the matter..... estimated a chance of 50-50 to a deal being stuck' and the FT relayed that.
One of the most important factors in deal making, is positioning.

@Crank.... engage your brain. Why was SP only above 82p briefly on a day when a PI was looking to sell a large chunk and had set their broker a target price of 82p?
Surely you don't need this spelling out.....

Not that it should matter that there is an off board chat group, I know (or care) nothing of this. And neither should you girls care either. If you think a couple of PI's with relatively tiny investments in the general scheme of things can have any effect of sentiment or SP with a stock as large and dynamic as AML, you are absolutely deluded.

Shares hitting the open market at 50p though would have driven SP directly towards and probably through 50p....

Been here a while @StickItDown.... but now it gets interesting ;o)

Awesome video that!

Because the drop was overdone I think...
I'm not a chartist... but is that a head and shoulders formed inlets couple of days?

@Glide.... Google?

Yup exactly this @Scarface72.... I was surprised I managed to sell a chunk first thing at 2.95... re-bought at 2.72. Marginal gains that will multiply exponentially on results!

Exactly - my reasoning for the drop yesterday was the RNS highlighting the time scales.... ostensibly giving AIM gamblers a month or so to play with their funds elsewhere before maybe coming back.
But as you imply... that could easily backfire a little as SP could rise considerably towards spud.
Although.... the BIG win is on results huh.

Just to highlight... many are commentating on price movements compared to previous price levels. Previous levels are completely irrelevant because Accustem has been removed from the portfolio. I know we all know this.... but until Accustem has a clear value, it really is impossible to know where we are.

I wasn't intending to add more in here... but can't miss an opportunity!

I'm thinking the drop is due to the usual thing in AIM... an RNS specifies something happening several weeks away, some jump out of it with a view to coming back nearer the time, instead of their funds being tied up waiting.
Personally I think this SP is gonna rocket as soon as that ship moves....

Its very rare that running wet tyres until they turn into slicks is the right thing to do.... turns out last weekend was one of these once a decade occurrences. Lance found out the hard way. Every other race, tyres wear, they produce less grip, not more!

@Parsley2 Racing Point did the same with Perez.... they should never have pitted Stroll.