We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Oh, i thought I was your newest green bin addition.
Now I’m really upset :-(((
Mac
As I’ve stated previously, I am hear to call out where I see inconsistencies or query what I see as questionable comments. You may have noticed that I have been more forthright with you more recently which tells its own story.
I do not have a side, I am here until the end or we continue and mine, that’s slower but very fine by me to “maximise value for all shareholders”
I even called out Capn Tilly a couple of weeks ago and he took it as the gent he is and clarified his statement, classy.
I believe you are the first to bin me. Well done. Now I can continue to challenge anything you say which is dubious and all will continue to see it, strange why you would do that.
Unless you have another moniker;-)
mac@1723
Surely they would need a JORC first?.;-)
How much sleep do you get mate?
basemate.
Where have you seen it all before?
Your account is less than 2 weeks old.
Are you a double moniker bot???..???????
mac
Yesterday I posted "another 8000 in the ISA for me"
That's about as positive as I can be, by highlighting the potential value I see.
That doesn't drive a near compulsive need for me to post stuff that's already out there. Also, if there is no news (which there isn't atm) then I'm just sitting here waiting.
Some would say feet up, (I wouldn't) risk everywhere but that's my choice.
That hasn't been previously posted or RNS'd ;-)
Lucando
Yet you seem positive on Poly?
Best wishes at this terrible time Pete
They better look elsewhere mac as at 500,000t per year this will be smoked in no time ;-)
another 8000 in the ISA for me
DShox
Earlier you posted “ It's one person or group with multiple IDs - same idea to troll the bb to support their soon to be closed short or attempted cheaper entry having missed 8p”
Have you seen the share price..?
It was just that you both seemed to agree and yet disagree throughout the day in a very polite and non inflammatory manner.
Then when I looked through your history you both appear to post far more links per post than any other poster.
Oh, then DShox came and posted to ensure the post was lower down the list come Monday morning.
Oh, and DShox has a history that refers a lot to yourself and mac.
That was all.
PS (he’s imaginary) my friend.
Have a great evening all one of you ;-)
Bump
Hi LB
I just referenced the quote Mac provided, not every JORC reference in a 200 plus page document that I had never seen before.
My motive was to highlight that even with links a quote is only as transparent as the poster behind it.
Are you mac4671?? Asking for a friend ;-)
Russian Classification (A+B+C1 +C2) FFS !!!
In all seriousness though I do enjoy the back and forth to help us all gain a better understanding of where we are.
If we all agreed all of the time we would just accept things and carry on oblivious. mac has always been respectful and open to debate, which I in turn respect. It is how we all learn after all.
Good luck all, lets see where we end up this week.....
** According to the Russian classification (? + ? + ?1 + ?2).
(Paste issue)
LOL (still laughing!!!)
lovleyboy
Yep, no reason to disagree with mac.....
Unless the actual quote from the 2020 NN report was a double asterixis comment under the resources table on page 43 which in full states...
"* Data on mineral resources and ore reserves are based on the JORC Code, exclude GRK Bystrinkoye’s deposits. The 2018–2019 data include the Honeymoon Well project.
** According to the Russian classification (? + ? + ?1 + ?2)."
Lol, actually reinforcing my point of not needing JORC's, thanks mac !!
..and as LB states not required if NN are in for MT or flanks. Do you disagree?
I think it’s highly likely we shall see a mix of asset sale and EUA mining, probably with an agreement with NN for processing.
I see no one has an opinion on my 8.33% discount theory, I’m surprised about that.