Jolly19 Jan 2015 10:05
Been looking again at the question of 15% or 25% IRR. This sentence sums it up I think : "The Bondholders can also redeem the Bonds at a price that would yield a 25 per cent per annum IRR (the "Increased Redemption Price") on the occurrence of a change of control event of either DQE or DQE Mauritius or if a Qualified Liquidity Event (as defined below) has not taken place within three years of the Closing Date." I take this to mean, they can only get 25% if DQE or DQE Mauritius is taken over or goes belly up, OR the liquidity event doesn't take place in the 3-year window.
DQE is obviously pushing for this 'liquidity event' and move to Nasdaq from Aim so it should occur and prevent a 25% IRR.
--------------------------------
Meanwhile, the sp still plummets, yet from 14th Nov results : "The Company's discussions with an investor for financing the development and production of its properties are advanced and we are in the process of completing the documentation. However, working capital remains under pressure in the meantime. The receivables collection has continued to be slow, but now the Company has definitive commitments from the key parties for payments and we expect a significant reduction in the debtors by March 2015."
They managed the first part of this with the $50m Bond issue and I look forward to them fulfilling part 2 with making in-roads into the 'receivables' by March. Year-end is March 31st but the Results last year didn't come out until June 2nd, so there may be a considerable wait for this news.
-------------------------------
There are a lot of conditions on this Bond Issue and, because it is so large, these issues are warned as possibly terminal. On the other hand a lot of what is in the Dec 9th Bond issue documentation is probably quite standard and perhaps not as worrying as it might at first appear. Tapaas is obviously very pleased that we now have the cash to pursue many different productions simultaneously - I have a reasonably good feeling about all this. Not sure when the 'liquidity event' will take place - within 3 years?! I am thinking this looks like shareholders will either get a payout then or be offered Nasdaq shares, though this doesn't seem yet to be finalised.
------------------------
Basically trying to work out whether it's worth averaging down???