RE: PPP & UKOG28 Jul 2024 09:16
The RNS 12/6/24 was not via Reach, therefore seems likely that Nomad - who is very strict on what can be said - must have been satisfied on the content ie that it is supported by evidence. If a placing was the source of Bells comment then because of the closeness Nomad would have insisted full and complete disclosure.
I accept that Bell has not had a good record in recent years of delivering value, but that can be said of most AIM companies.
As has been pointed out many times most commodity AIM companies have been pretty much sunk in recent years (commodity cycle/ funding difficulties) RRR not excluded but still survives and at these levels could easily be very lucrative. One lucky break RRR becomes an AIM multi-bagger. Gold obviously been the focus.
For the record I’ve only arrived very recently and see very good risk v reward opportunity. Not interested in tittle tattle just the very undervalued assets but a few on here clearly still very aggrieved it seems, from many years back. For health and mental sakes my advice is to move on.
Did someone say you aren’t a shareholder here? And that you have issues with Bell from years ago? Oh well, each to their own, don’t see the point myself, life is too short without peeps beating themselves up.
Let’s see how things pan out.
Good luck to all genuine investors, a pivotal time right now.