RE: Ontarget29 Sep 2021 14:27
I was probably unnecessarily harsh and I apologise for that.
However it's still valid to ask why, when a holder has apparently had this contempt as you call it for many years, why didn't they decide to sell and find a better place to put their money as soon as "he failed to deliver, annually" became evident to them, instead of holding on through 5,6,7+ more years? The non-delivery wasn't up to them, but the decision not to sell and keep holding for years afterwards was.