Member Info for Only1Gibbo

So are you suggesting that if he could've announced the contract in Feb 18 he shouldn't have done so just in case something in the middle east kicked off at some point in the future? and that he should have told the Iranian's where to stick their business just as a precaution in case Donald Trump decided to pick a fight with them?

Yes that link has been posted before (yawn), but he still wasn't paid £310k. Half of that was an accounting entry for share options awarded. None of which are currently worth anything as the SP isn't high enough yet. Stop trying to mislead.

No he wasn't Vander as you well know.

Still waiting for an answer to my question Phil. Come on, don't be shy! I've been waiting all Xmas to be dazzled by your entrepreneurial flair and commercial acumen.

Just in case you've forgotten the question "So what would you have done differently Phil if you were in charge?"

Well there is no shortage of non investors and traders here. We all need the contract concluded to make good on our investment Feeks. I suspect the reason they gave an estimate before was because the current issues between MPS and GPHA weren't known to us at that point, and 30 days probably wasn't an unreasonable expectation at that point. Now we have two third parties arguing the toss, so it is anybody's guess as to when they will reach a compromise. Yes it would be nice to know when it will be concluded, but without any control over that timeline, I don't see the point in feeding the non invested and traders. Have a good Christmas Feeks, look to the future, it's only just begun!

Feeks, your response to Phil's post , "he has a point", who seemed to think that it was laughable, something isn't quite right, and that PF should be fired if this doesn't get over the line, led me to think you were on his back. Maybe I misunderstood, but usually calling for someone's head isn't generally seen as a measure of support.

Of course concluding Tema is crucial to the SP. But what is the point of giving an expectation of timing that they cannot control? I'm sure the BoD do have a reasonable view of the expected timing, but as they cannot guarantee it, nor influence it, what's the point in setting such an expectation? Maybe you won't complain if it is missed, but there are plenty that will seek to spin that as a failure on the part of PF and the BoD if that does happen, even if it is out of their control.

Feeks even back on the day Tema was announced, PF said he didn’t know whether it would be completed within 30 days. The LOI said they should aim for 30 days, but clearly the issues between MPS and GPHA weren’t anticipated to have gone on this long,

You crucify PF because he said hopefully 30 days and it didn’t happen. So now you want him to give another date that isn’t within his control. What’s the point in that? And what will be your reaction if MPS and GPHA don’t settle their differences by then? No doubt you’ll be on his back again. He has already told you we are the sole appointed operator, that we have been doing the job for 6 months and are getting paid on account.

You’re not going to get a blow by blow analysis of the contract details because they are commercial sensitive, and you’re not going to get fanfares of how much it is worth when there are issues between MPS and GPHA over the fees being charged. Surely you can see that would be a stupid thing to do?

Quite possible Bigears. If I recall correctly that was the port that had a security tender open on the link Novice posted on 10 November.

This is from the most recent one Feeks

“ We are pleased to note that the ongoing discussions between Meridian Port Services and the Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority are close to being finalised which will allow for our contracts to be formally exchanged, albeit this is a formality given we are already appointed and operational”

Pretty explicit to me.

This from 18 Nov RNS
“.... receiving payments on account for work undertaken, whilst awaiting formal signing of contracts to be completed once certain financial arrangements between MPS and GPHA had been put in place.”

And then there is 18 Sept RNS
“The various contractual arrangements between all the different parties, MPS, Scanport, Westminster and support contractors, are agreed in principle and Westminster is pleased with the outcome. Contracts are due to be signed once certain financial arrangements between MPS and the port authorities have been put in place, which are in the process of being finalised”

Not very vague to me. Fairly explicit we are awaiting negotiations between MPS and the port authorities to complete first. Why do think they are vague?

My optimism hasn’t evaporated one bit. I just want to know what Phil or even you for that matter would have done differently as you appear to be so critical.

So what would you have done differently Phil if you were in charge?

Aiming, I still think you are wrong about the African airport, I don’t think it is dead.

I don’t think Africa can be written off yet Aiming. If my theories are correct I am still hopeful of movement on that one in H1 2020.

I think you've missed the point wpa. Yes we know that is the existing Euro Ops website. I'm referring to the website euro-ops-group.com , which is a website currently under construction, and as of the time of posting this is 5 days, 19 hours and 30 minutes until it presumably goes live.

The 2018 accounts stated

"On 1 May 2019, the Company announced the acquisition of the entire issued share capital of French aviation security and support services company Euro Ops SRL (‘Euro Ops’) along with the business and assets of Euro Ops International SRL (‘Euro Ops Int.’) for EUR€ 20,000."

Which means we only acquired one legal entity, Euro Ops SRL, which is confirmed in note 15 of the accounts as Euro Ops SRL is the only French subsidiary listed.

The website that Eskers posted last week, which appears to be a countdown to a new Euro Ops website given the picture of an airliner on the countdown page, is euro-ops-group.com

So if this is the WSG Euro Ops, it now appears to be a group of companies. Questions to be answered are, what are the names of its group undertaking(s) and where is(are) it(they) registered?

Welcome back Ned

TP, you may very well be right, but how can you be sure it hasn't been found? Not every piece of information unearthed is posted on the BBs.

Aiming, flip a coin. Heads go with the bulls, tails with the bears and if it stands on its edge, read Lefkosia's posts very carefully.

But also look at his post from 13.25 Aiming, which says ignore the 13.17 post.

Etin

In fairness to Tosh I was one of those sources that said to him 100% convinced it is Oman. The view was based on what appeared very strong evidence at the time. I’d be more than happy to share it with you privately and I’m sure you would then understand the view formed. I still remain convinced that we had some dealings, either unsuccessfully looking for business or doing something of lower value around that time in Oman. Even last week, another little piece of evidence was unearthed showing that we were in Oman, although it wasn’t Muscat.