Member Info for OneAussie

Hagis,
you remind me of a batteries commercial with a bunny never running out of energy.
What I remember about it is that it was annoyingly stupid.

Aussie.

"Seminars and green rhetoric."

Vince,
you're spot on, just like COVID, the Ukraine mess, etc., some shady characters (in power) are manipulating the green rhetoric to their own benefit.

a.

SR,
1. The article was written in Nov. '22 but one would should be weary of what Edison say about QFI, they're paid to say nice things.
2. It is assumed to be OCP. About a year ago QFI bungled up and in one of their fancy PowerPoint presentations uploaded they had OCP on it. I raised this on the forum as being the first time for QFI to acknowledge OCP but within hours the image was Photoshop'ed and OCP disappeared

3. My gut feeling is that QFI is dealing with a low-level technical department and probably the top-level management has no idea who QFI is. If you look at who's on BoD at OCP it's like looking at the Moroccan Government (quite a few ministers).

a.

Let's not put the cart before the horse:
first of all the 'mystery group' has to say 'yes, I want your fuel'

But this 'Moroccan project' smelled funny from day one so I wouldn't be surprised if our Dear Leader will tell us that the 'mystery group' chose a different path for de-carbonization.
I can almost have a small bet on this.

a.

"JachG.Who were the panelists ?"

HF,
it was Dear Leader plus a few other B-Grade actors.

Aussie.

DoN,
I know you have a head on your shoulders and my 'big fuss' comment wasn't targeted towards you, my apologies.

The 'big fuss' comment was for all these people coming out of the woodwork and starting pumping/ramping and coming up with all sorts of predictions.

It was also intended for people who simply say stupid things, like my newly found friend, Cargogas. LOL

a.

Thanks, Cargogaz,
I appreciate your sarcasm. LOL

a.

I don't understand the big fuss about this RNS.

What did QFI achieve in this RNS? The fact that it managed to complete the shipment of goods between two countries in 4 MONTHS? Is QFI now in the customs broking business to make this an outstanding achievement?

Even a half-brained customs broker could've done a better job and investigated the laws & requirements of the destination country before sending the goods without thinking.
Not long ago I shipped certain goods from Europe to Australia and although I was convinced that my goods will clear AQIS (Australian Quarantine & Inspection Service) I chose to hire a broker and it was money well spent. He picked up immediately on the fact that although my goods will clear AQIS it would be the stuff the packaging is made of that it would land me in hot water with AQIS. Changing the packaging with the approved materials made it smooth sailing all the way to the front of my house.

So, now I ask the audience: Why didn't QFI hire a proper customs broker to make their shipping smooth sailing?

I rest my case.

a.

Haggis,
Peruse your long post again and look for the word 'discussions'.
All three updates about MSC, Utah & Morocco contain this word and this is exactly what our Bod are good at.
Everything else around it is window dressing.

A.

.... past narratives are irrelevant....
You're obviously not familiar with targets/deadlines/budgets/etc.

Come to think of it... what are you familiar with? Not much that I can think of... apart from 'pumping'
Maybe you can impress the newcomers on the scene but you certainly won't impress me.

a.

"Going back to the RNS of 16 January,....."

Haggis,
Why don't you go back 10-15 RNS's and you'll see the same narrative but different dates?
That's the only visible thing they do, keep changing dates.

a.

"If you claim JM is incompetent, kindly list your evidence of this, and when I say evidence I mean verifiable facts."

Haggis,
Seriously, you don't see it?
HF14 gave you a clear answer, you should memorize it.

a.

"JM should be doing what a CEO should be doing, promoting the business at events like this."

Haggis,
JM is a competent chemist but an incompetent CEO.
We needed a salesman to take up the CEO position and things could've been very different now.

a.

"Discuss, Explore, Test, Prod,Poke. Think JM is on the celebrity tour of Chat show hosts now."

Vince,
you are spot on!

a.

"Our £300k CEO can't be wrong again!!!!"
Yes, he can!
Past statements prove my point.

a.

JM should've stuck with his CTO job and play with his Petri dishes, he is a chemist, not a businessman.
But he saw an opportunity to triple his salary by becoming a CEO and now we pay the price for his incompetence.

Aussie

asimpleinvestor,
That's crap, they get their full pay.
I am amazed at how convincing you sound. LOL

a.

No.
2023 is different because the funds will run out.
They will have to come out with cap in hand begging again to fund their lavish work style, big wages vs. no results & accountability.
a.

2023 will be the make-or-break year:
A. If they run out of cash before they sign a contract, with their horrible track record I don't think they'll find any investors to give them more money.
B. If they manage to sign a contract before they run out of cash, 2024 could be a rollercoaster ride, in a positive way I mean.

What do you think is going to happen? A or B?

Aussie.

& TEQUILA