Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
It’ll be interesting to see which over budget and late projects in the south benefit.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-51823021
OR
It still needs to pass scrutiny in the High Court.
Disgruntled shareholders, past and present, will have the opportunity to make their views known.
Anyone with ShareSoc know if this is being coordinated?
OR
https://twitter.com/emilygosden/status/1234930933423333376?s=21
Probably will be a Yes after a bit of horse trading with Odey..
OR
casapinos
I guess when they saw the increased security they decided not to try to gain entry.
Serve it cold.
OR
Well I voted no. Happy to lose a few quid if that is the outcome.
But I suspect that the vote will be to accept the offer.
OR
I sincerely hope so.
Let’s restore our National Park.
OR
if they knew they were in serious trouble when they held the AGM in York.
The miserable faces of the BodD on that day suggests that they knew they were looking at hundreds of people who they had screwed over.
OR
The more that I hear from the weasels the more I’m happy with my 155,000 votes.
OR
Tomorrow or so rumour has it.
OR
quickfeet, what is your stake in SXX. You’ve been posting in this BB for 3 days now so you must be a LTH.
At to your comments regarding administration, you may be right. Time will tell.
OR
I think the vote will be Yes (but I voted No). It could be very close.
A No vote ‘could’ lead to administration. Administrators will deal with the sale in a more professional and open manner (than the BoD). Whatever the outcome of administration, I will be satisfied that I did what little I could do. I will accept the result.
A Yes vote sees those buying today gaining 30%+.
There’s still time for another twist.
OR
The sp is dropping as people fold.
I remain poker-faced.
OR
The result should be announced tomorrow.
OR
Gertfrobe
Casapinos has probably forgotten more than most of this BB will ever know about the stock market.
OR
You cannot emphasise it’s certainty and then add ‘in my opinion’.
Nothing is certain.
I would expect administrators to manage the disposal of SM in a more impartial manner than our BoD.
My view is that if you were to vote ‘yes’, you should have sold up when the sp was 5.5p. That would have provided some certainty for you rather risking a ‘No’ vote.
The only reason to hold must have been to vote ‘No’.
OR
We could have sold everything except the MTS for £1 and retained the MTS.
I’ve bought some shares in AAL (down 10% so far so still better than SXX :) )
OR
The SM business case was rather compelling. It remains just as compelling today.
I take full responsibility for the number of shares that I hold. My diversification comes from owning properties rather than other stocks.
I would readily accept the AAL offer if I thought it was fair and reasonable. It is not. I believe it to be opportunistic at best and potentially a potash cartel play. Time will tell on that one.
SM have failed because CF failed to attract Stage 2 funding. Brexit uncertainty caused by our government’s inept strategy for delivering on the result of the 2016 referendum will have played a part. Had the government no been stronger and spoken with one voice, Brexit would have been delivered in March 2019. The junk bond markets would have been more likely to support the cash raise.
I don’t want the BoD to benefit from the sale of our mine. And I’m prepared to throw my No vote in to the ring. Whatever the outcome of the vote I will sleep well knowing that I acted in line with my conscience. That is democracy.
I will not be bullied in to voting for something that I do not believe is right.
OR
I guess so. He’s over on GGP now spouting the same happy clappy stuff.
I really hope he has learnt something from his experience here - but I doubt it. He needs to bank some profits on the pump phase and buy back on the dump phase.
https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/jonesrichard/
OR