Member Info for ns20

today would be a good day for VELA and MODE. . Bitcoin at nearly £35k . . .

The most recent one, that SYME is the PSC is settling. . .

Wowzers! I still can't funamentally compute Bitcoins value, when it has no value. . .

Wowzers! I still can't funamentally compute Bitcoins value, when it has no value. . .

Has anyone seen the price movement of Bitcoin today? £32k for one bitcoin ?????

Looking at the charts, and recent memories, when MODE took off and hit 66p-67p, VELA hit 0.10p. . . If MODE keeps going, at the rate of Bitcoinc is going back up, this should surely not be long to have a cheeky little rise.

The new Ltd company is most defintely connected then.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13151712/filing-history

I'm currently at 10.6m. . .

Well spotted. . . has the hallmarks of potentially being involved at an early stage.

1p party. . .pmsl. . . I have got "From Dusk till Dawn" from this post. . .

If the Shares drop 50%, that will more than likely result in institutional investors taking more of the 20% or so, held by Public Investors. A lot of what happens will depend on news. . .. It can stay in suspension for me, until news is ready. . . . No volatility whilst suspended. Got to be good for a long term investor.

Good Luck everyone. . . .

Another of our Heroes & Gentlemen taken. R.I.P Sir Tom

Surprised to see the sells. . . Not many fans of Cheech and Chong here then. . .

BigDave13 (AKA Septic Peg) Good call

The restorations are updated 35 minutes past the hour every hour so it could be any time soon.

HI there, Ellllteinv, I don't consider myself an expert far from it. . . simply one of lifes' scholars seeking further education. .

Hi Parm, well this BB, like many others is full of investors that do not know the full in's and out's of their investments. There are very few that are qualified to make a professional opinion, however everyone has the right to state their own opinion. I have read so much that I disagree with, but I don't react to it. . . I take a step back and question why does my opinion differ. Somethings I have got it wrong, other times I giggle or think "ah bless"

HI all, whether it was a troll or not, I looked at it with the merit it deserved and it was a valid question. Something that I had not considered. Either way, it should not be an issue for Supply@Me when up and running but a very valid argument / process question to help protect the investors. I suspect that this has been thought of already. The underwriters and professionals doing the due diligence will, you would hope, be switched on.

I would imagine that the stock is purchased for the monetised price and exchanged for a secured note. The secured note would have a fixed price. Then to buy the stock back would be that fixed price. . . It would get interesting if the stock plummetted and you decided not to buy that stock back and buy and sell from elsewhere. . . I wonder where the protection would be for the investor or if the insurance would cover this?