Member Info for Notposting

What on earth are you on about now? I haven’t provided anyone’s numbers. I have only been on here for 6 months or so, so your comment sharing anything a few years ago is strange. You’ve no idea what I do with my money, trading or otherwise. I also don’t take part in placings.

As for ‘trolling’ Hemogenyx, I’ve done nothing of the sort. All I’ve done is call out false or misleading statements, just as I’ve called out some on the opposing side too. I’m not emotionally invested in this the way you clearly are, judging by your comments.

I post here a few times a day during downtime, nothing more. My trading days are long behind me. I now only invest long term.

Give me strength. How does anyone take any of you lot seriously?

You say you haven’t given any guarantees, yet your exact words were: ‘But I can tell you now if you hold HEMO for 6 months you will make a lot of money.’ That is, by definition, a guarantee.

It must be tough being called out repeatedly and made to look silly, so I can understand why you’d want to react that way. If it helps you emotionally, then fair enough. But your paranoia is disturbing and suggesting someone can have comments removed from a forum is just absurd.

Quite a statement, CheckRicky. £18 isn’t remotely realistic without major involvement or significant CBR progress. These kinds of wild predictions don’t help anyone and you've been wrong every time. It might be time to tone down the fantasy.

'But I can tell you now if you hold HEMO for 6 months you will make a lot of money."

Promising guaranteed profits in a speculative share like HEMO isn’t optimism. It’s irresponsibility. Comments like that mislead people. Dangerous and absurd in equal measure, but that isn't unusual for you judging by your previous posts.

It’s not a requirement. The FDA must be notified, but the company isn’t obligated to report it publicly ie if it’s natural not due to safety etc. This is common practice.

😂😂 Chris “ deranged Norman Bates' sexual infatuation with his mother.” That made me laugh out loud too much.

Here he goes again. It isn't going to be significant nor imminent. Lord help this emotional stooge.

No, that's welcome, and plenty manage it without mistaking fiction for fact, or twisting it for profit.

It’s always better to let the news speak for itself, rather than get caught up in hype or noise from some. Much better like this.

You only know what you’re told or what is released; anything else is speculation, not fact. Be mindful of how you make such statements, as you’ve made a few that are incorrect and appear to be intentionally so.

No one is talking to you. It is not about you, and I do not know why you think you are so important. I could not care less what you do. You have made multiple false statements and been fact-checked. That is not a lie. I have better things to do, so I will step away and let you reflect on the fact that you are just another random on a bulletin board, as am I, and no one is concerned about either of us.

I’ll leave you to it today if you think that helps. I am sure investors prefer your shouting, hype, and claims of £24 over balanced views that might actually help them.

I also appreciate that your recent trade did not go to plan, so you need this to rise in order to try again.

Have a good day.

Mystic Meg is back. What a statement, once again presented as fact when it clearly isn’t.

You’re welcome to do that. I have supported every argument I have put forward and done so with decorum, unlike some. It does not change the position. I have not spread a single lie, other than missing one change relating to Estonia, which I corrected.

This post alone shows how much of an echo chamber this place has become, and that is never a good thing for investors.

Sad world we live in, but whatever floats your boat. Reporting me won’t change facts.

I’m not on Twitter. It seems emotions are again getting the better of you, with repeated suggestions that people are the same person using multiple aliases or posting elsewhere. That kind of paranoia or narrative is concerning, and it will not distract from the facts. Your comment suggesting I have bought under one narrative and sold under another makes no sense and highlights how unfounded these conspiracy theories are. My position has been consistent, unlike some of you whose narrative changes with your position.

And yes, there are criteria, criteria you keep glossing over while making it sound like this is an open route to worldwide commercialisation that will earn billions. That is not correct. Estonia has not even received a green light, and it is not going to be anything major in terms of revenue. That is fact.

Thanks. It was actually May 2025 it seems but my points stand.

The amendment removed the restriction that only one holder of a hospital exemption authorisation could manufacture an advanced therapy for up to 10 patients under that route. 

That said it is still not “unlimited” by default: Each application still defines the patient group, medical need, and scope. The Estonian Medicines Agency decides case by case. So while the 10-patient statutory cap is gone, practical limits still exist and regulators will not authorise open-ended mass production under a hospital exemption.

Under the new rules, a hospital exemption authorisation is still valid for up to 2 years (so no that isn’t rubbish as you put it) but may be renewed for up to 5 years per renewal (and it may be renewed repeatedly) if quality, safety, and requirements are met.

Some AI for you - Hospital exemption remains “non-routine, custom-made, for an individual patient.” It is not meant for industrial-scale roll-out. Every treated patient must still meet criteria (no other therapy available, standard options exhausted, etc.), and pharmacovigilance and GMP obligations remain. Reimbursement by Estonia’s Health Insurance Fund is a separate negotiation. Even if manufacturing limits are relaxed, financial barriers remain.

It will not stop the hype from some, but the reality is that headway should be a concern. If warrants are not exercised or a halt occurs, for example, risk rises further, particularly with paediatric trials and dose escalation. This is more of a consideration down the line, but it is why I suggested that a smart CEO would have underscored the financial position with a raise at the peak, had he left a means to do it. Unless a major partner comes on board, the only realistic route to funding remains dilution.

I think the only person watching and learning will be you that posting nonsense doesn’t equate to a positive share movement.

That’s your prerogative, but it does not justify making misleading posts. They are unhelpful, and you appear to be making them knowingly.

Yes, and statistical probability is exactly why Phase 1 data cannot be taken as proof of efficacy. Until then, you’re speculating on limited information. Speculative probability also doesn’t translate to it’s a cure or it’s working.

Anyway, better things to do. Just stop with the hype posts. It’s not good.