Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
I think that asking those questions that he asked are very healthy for deciding whether the stock is worth it or not.Blindly buying AML just because Stroll or Moers bought the company is less wise than buying also because you understand the business,the market and finanacials of companies in general or this particular case. He also came out and said well done to others this morning, and as far as I am aware he also said he owns AML stocks .
this data is for the UK only
Again those numbers...will be 14 pound in mid December...so will be bad if in 2024 it will be 5,6,7 pounds
2.30 would be a nice price at this moment for sure...sadly we are at 70s' :)
Hi.It is pointless to compare prices as such ,there were some dilutions since the 15 pound price.Market cap can be compared if you want.
I am sorry but to think someone like Vettel or Toto would play Strolls game just to bail/cover the other out is unrealistic. I do think that Vettel bought shares(god knows how many,could be 1000) ,and Totos company figured as one of major shareholders ( if they sell I believe they have to announce it like II did).
Is that a bad thing from your point of view?
Thanks for the info. But then why does Stroll involve Wolff,Vettel and Mercedes in all this mess? That is what does not add up to me....
Does that mean that basically we will have 20 times less shares and at 20 times the price? that is I had 20.000 shares @100 pence, I will have 1000 shares @2000 pence( example) ?
Morning.Wait what? that means that MB will aquire shares in two years time for 62 pence? In that case,doesn't it mean that we are pretty much stuck at this price for the 2 years?
Morning, what does the new RNS mean ? Is it something new or what was already said in yesterdays RNS's as it isn't clear for me...
Vettel is overrated.Perez is the better driver of the two at this moment. I don't like the decision from a racing standpoint,whether from a marketing standpoint is better or not,I can't judge. Fact is Vettel got trumped by Ricciardo after coming into "Vettels playground" ,Red Bull, and he beat Raikkonen, doesn't impress me,and got trumped by Leclerc again in Vettels playground....
I understand that most of us have bought share of AML and want to make a quick buck as fast as possible, but why would you go crazy on the price on a daily basis? whether the company is doing good or bad is irrespective of the current price(I know that the company doing good affects the stock price), but even if today closes at 57 or 67,the financials of AML will be the same...(of course if a new dilution is not prepared :D). This stock and company hast to grow, it won'be an overnight success,if Stroll manages to turn things around ,it will take time.so be prepared, it will need 2 years to be a success,minimum..... So in 2 years time the price will be important,or in 10 years time,depending on when you want to sell....
Just also remember that most shares already climbed back what they have lost prior to covid,and are overvalued IMO.Of course that does not apply to AML
Thanks!
That I understand,but as a record you are then basically selling when shorting and buying when closing your ahort position,right?
when you "short" / sell you do buy actually? and when you close the short position you sell? or it's vice versa? Thannks
Thanks for the explanation.
I will be fair and not pretend to get it, it is still not clear to me.
So ,I will explain how I understand it(Seems wrongly). No of shares bought and sold should be reflected in the market price,because if the demand is greater,the price should go higher. But probably since it is not an ideal market,the buys and sells are not at the current live/SP price,but somehow influenced by the sell and buy price set by the buyers/sellers.
Oh well,I am lost :))
Hi,thanks for the numbers,if todays more shares have been bought then sold,then why there is a drop in price? I don't understand how that is possible.Can you explain it to me? Thanks :)
Stroll , Wolff are the average joes and you are the institutional investor, I assume.