Member Info for nomlungu

Tullaghan Well said.

jjp1985 Regenerative determinism? It is a good approach for FTSE intra-day trading but sometimes does not work on AIM shares, as seen today.

Your charts work on historical data - AIM is an undiscovered wilderness so charting becomes irrelevant. VAL's accounts said that funding was required and this has been confirmed today.

applegarth, posts but will not reply - wtf? ah - I remember; I am a cannibal http://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.asp?ShareTicker=TWO&share=

MisterPositive and applegarth, You have been 'positive' about this share - please explain why the additional shares are due to be authorised at the AGM on Tuesday morning. Thank you.

And now Mr P wants to ramp again?

At the AGM they are asking via resolutions 6 and 7 to raise an 'aggregate nominal amount of four hundred and seven thousand four hundred and sixty two pounds and seventy one pence (�407,462.71)'. The nominal value of each share is 0.1p so they are asking to have the authority to double the number of shares in issue. Today's RNS announces that they have conditionally raised �950k [there will be costs involved] through the issue of 47.5 million shares. As they have no current authority to issue shares this must be approved at the AGM on Tuesday. If resolutions 6 and 7 are passed the bod will have the authority to issue approximately 360 million more shares within the next 15 months. To me this is a red flag warning of further dilution. Please remember, this is in my unprofessional opinion, dyor etc. I post this again to remind those blinded by applegarth's ramptastic posting that you should not believe what you read on bulletin boards, nor assume or presume why people post on them.

Casper786 capitalisos is a dangerous disease - hopefully your twenty thousand post will see you cured.

Fredd1eboy, Nice reply - thank you. My charity of choice is http://sinethemba.info/special-care-centre/ I shall make another donation over the weekend as a mark of respect to a recently departed family member. She got to 97.

Fredd1eboy, No offence but the RNS does state 'conditionally raised' - the shares cannot be issued unless the resolutions are passed at the AGM next week. Personally, I have seeing investors get shafted but the last accounts clearly warned that VAL are reliant on raising funds. If you chose to ignore what was written in the accounts and comments made by posters on this bulletin board who were sceptical about the mythical pharma deal then you may wish to reconsider your approach to investing and the reliance you place on posters who are a little to optimistic about the shares you invest in. Anyway - it is only money; health and happiness is more important.

Currently there are 407,462,717 shares in issue. At the AGM they are asking via resolutions 6 and 7 to raise an 'aggregate nominal amount of four hundred and seven thousand four hundred and sixty two pounds and seventy one pence (�407,462.71)'. The nominal value of each share is 0.1p � so they are asking to have the authority to double the number of shares in issue. Today's RNS announces that they have conditionally raised �950k [there will be costs involved] through the issue of 47.5 million shares. As they have no current authority to issue shares this must be approved at the AGM on Tuesday. If resolutions 6 and 7 are passed the bod will have the authority to issue approximately 360 million more shares within the next 15 months. To me this is a red flag warning of further dilution. Please remember, this is in my unprofessional opinion, dyor etc.

That was before the RNS was announced... DYOR etc

applegarth, VAL do not currently have the authority to issue more shares hence resolutions 6 and 7 are set to be voted on at the AGM next week.

BritishBulldog, There are numerous free online courses that could help you gain knowledge. Are you aware of EDX? This free online course from The University of Michigan may be of interest to you. https://www.edx.org/course/financial-institutions-markets-michiganx-fin403x

The user numbers are high here - maybe some block chain tech needs to be added?

The Hackernoon link is interesting reading. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Kraken+Cracked+By+New+York

I do not often comment on this board but I could have gone on a night out at the dogs and returned home better off than buying this share. I have another Woodford share that is similarly down [ITX]. I think I am going to have to book an appointment with my psychiatrist and see what can be prescribed.

Iced tea maker soars 500% after pivot to blockchain: https://www.ft.com/content/3fa91346-e670-11e7-8b99-0191e45377ec Amazing what a name change can bring... In my unprofessional opinion, dyor, etc; do not believe what is posted on bulletin boards or assume the motives of the poster

cadburyhill, Your comments about global consumer goods being slow to change is correct - there are many entrenched economic operators that stand to loose financially if they move to newer technology. I have some shares in another Woodford company [TRX] which has been facing a similar problem gaining market penetration [into a completely different market though].

You make a good point about the deep pockets of the main shareholders. I dislike averaging down but have to seriously consider doing so this week. imo, dyor, do not believe bulletin board posters etc