RE: New Old Chairman20 Mar 2022 10:04
Whilst I think I understand your anti HARL motivations I don’t think I understand how you are able to make the statement about being in a position to take on larger contracts. Anything greater than about £10 million will have a very accretive impact on the vale of the company. The larger contracts eg MOD in the hundreds of millions are likely to be placed in the established yards initially but I fully expect HARL to win sizeable elements of these through subcontracts which are likely to be in the tens of millions. I think the difference between you and me and possibly most of the posters is that we actually want the company to succeed. I’m not sure you and your acolytes do so why waste your time and energy on here; perhaps you’ve a historical axe to grind or it’s some kind of personal issue with people in the company. Do pray tell if you’re able to.
The global industrial and energy complexes are in complete disarray. This turmoil, isolating Russia and leaving Ukraine unable to function means the infrastructure HARL owns is going to be put into good use whoever is in charge. As for the storage project, I’m in no doubt big companies with plans for the asset and the way it will integrate into the GB/Irish future energy mix are in detailed discussions on development of the asset.
The problem is how long this is taking. The debt facility has bought valuable time, will ensure that HARL survives and in what is supposed to be a transformative year hopefully thrives as well. I wait for the promised contracts to emerge GLA