Member Info for Njames

Anything of substance in terms of why the cases should not be closed? Or just procedural stuff.

Resource estimates are a long way from reserves and subject to a myriad of contingencies and assumptions. If there were really 202 tcf in place and 30 tcf recoverable RESERVES (proved probable or possible) someone would be recovering them.

202 tcf? 😂🤣

That's Vakhtang's 3rd or 4th Frontera profile and he dates his employment back to 1997. I wouldn't read too much into it.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/vakhtang-glonti-5a82181b6/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/bacho-vakhtang-glonti-407a8694/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/vakhtang-glonti-609b11247/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/vakhtang-glonti-152099315/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/vakhtang-glonti-11a13846/

SN has always punched above his weight politically thanks to his Dad. It's how the original Frontera had Lloyd and Lan Bentsen, the elder Nicandros and former Energy Secretary and Mayor of Houston Bill White. They got the concessions in Azerbaijan and Georgia in the late 90s. They talked a good game. But have lost everything due to a variety of reasons that need not be rehashed. That's the nature of the business. The fact that he's still in good graces in some Georgian circles is a tribute to his continuing efforts and he's lost a lot of his family fortune in this venture, but it won't change his life.

Aro has his own company. If something were to come good in Georgia it's probably good for business.

He rode us to a pot of something all right.

Giving the silent treatment to the Frontera "family" since 24th Jan 2019, but "fighting for us."

There has been some activity in the above case in Harris County. Apparently, Georgia is now a signatory to the Hague Service Convention which allows for alternative methods of service on foreign defendants. FIC/FRGC now in the hands of the liquidators are still pursuing SN and ZM and were never able to successfully serve ZM before. They are now attempting to serve ZM under the Hague Convention, which they say is a lengthy process. They have therefore filed a motion to postpone the trial date to October 2025. The motion is unopposed by SN.

There is also a new trial date set for September/October 2024 for the Yellow Jacket case.

Sorry, the name "spewtin" for Putin was the tell. That was a RR special.

Thanks, RR.

ODR, you sound a tad defensive. Liquidators may or may not have been looking on here, but that's beside the point. The company sent a message through Looed that was shared on here and a poster then sent it to the liquidators asking them to confirm the contents. Like poking the bear. Of course, they then took issue with the content, which caused the company to lose a bit of credibility in terms of its intended messaging. So my point was simply that I suspect the company won't be sharing anything further via that route as a result. Not that any super secret or not for public consumption information that the liquidators wouldn't otherwise have access to was shared.

Be that as it may, you are right not to share publicly the info provided you by the liquidators under the stated conditions.

Coming down the home stretch! Won't be long now.

Article about ex President Saakashvilli.

https://theins.ru/en/politics/269945

I hope not as well, but that is my fear. We shall see.

I doubt there will ever be another update from the company via Looed on this site after a poster took the exact words and sent them to the liquidators.

Agreed. The "our leader fights for us" schtick sounds an awful lot like RR's cheerleading for ZM back in the day.

BLOE market cap is £8.24m. A good reminder that 2C resource estimates =/= proven/probable reserves.

I believe 2010/11. Didn't they say in the few months before delisting that they had signed an NDA with a major to look at data? IRRC that one was stated or rumored to be BP.

Exxon has looked at the data at least 1/2 times in the past and took a pass. Seems like it would take some new information to bring them to the table for Block XII.

Interesting, Looed. This means that other entities named "Frontera Resources Corporation" have been created outside of the original structure as set out in the arbitration document and the AIM listing document. On what basis would the directors of an entity outside of the corporate structure of FRC-C have standing to engage with the liquidators of FRC-C, other than as former directors responding to inquiries by the duly appointed liquidators?