Member Info for nice1

A reminder what d2p can be used for and more.

Applications:
• Buildings: Plastic table-tops and worktops, plastic cladding of walls, ceilings & floors, ventilation and water pipes, paint, decking etc.
• Agriculture: Greenhouse films, irrigation pipes etc.
• Clothing and accessories: Wet suits, shoes, insoles, lab coats, face masks etc.
• Electronic: Keyboards, mouse and mats, cell phone cases, calculators, remote controls, touch screen devices.
• Miscellaneous: Garbage sacks and carrier bags, credit, debit, and membership cards, and plastic banknotes, BSI Assurrauncbe Mbarek r gaskets, travel trays, play pit balls etc.
• Sanitary: Toilet seats, shower heads, shower curtains, hand dryers, bed-pans, portable toilets, soap holders etc.
• Cosmetic: Shampoo and cosmetic containers.
BSI Assurance Mark for multiple standards.
• Sports: Insoles, ski boots, trainers, swimming pool mats, floats, knee-pads.
If you have more than one standard or scheme with BSI, you’re able to use the personalized
• Transportation: Car, tube, train, plane interiors.

The below is from SYM who also read the article link from the Express.
I would think the company will contact the journalist to make the awareness of how advanced SYM is with Bioplastics.

Symphony Environmental Technologies Plc has gone one step further than Ineos by finding a way to make almost all plastic products lethal to microbes – see http://www.d2p.net

https://bioplasticsnews.com/2020/05/18/michael-stephen-plastiphobia-false-descriptions-recycling-myth/

Da_Gee I understand now want you mean my apologies.
It is nice to see oil moving up but this pattern with Mosmans even when oil was much higher we did not see the share price respond.
How do we get through to John and make changes with connecting to the investors, if he can do this the company will be more noticed.

I would not put any more money into Arkoma, we need low cost wells and Stanley even at $25 it is profitable.

Increase in oil price will help and the sooner we can sell the other assets the better.

What I would like is the board to show more connection with share holders, more information detailing costs and improving on the PR. There old ways and not believing needs to change.

Please see below, sorry if already seen.
https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/918527/condor-gold-plc-now-has-over-1mln-ounces-of-gold-resources-permitted-for-extraction-918527.html

We have good assets and look how profitable Stanley wells are.
The bods do not see the importance of being up front with investors with net costs whiles other companies are quite happy to be.
The bods have not shown any signs of wanting the share price up and keep blaming everyone else but them selves.
Changes with how you present your self needs to be made, we was so close in being profitable at corporate level, any other company would have shown signs and would have come across in a manner of confidence.

There are companies who has really upset investors and are producing peanuts and they still getting more attention then Mosman's.

Presentation and good communication is a key importance, we have the assets even if Mosmans did question time for share holders, investors via Zoom or something.

This could turn around very quickly.

Thanks, it has been a very long wait and now hope to see a lot of interest from institutes and another investors, i do hope CNR are careful to whom they go to for funds if needed as i have had invested in 2 companies from the past who got to a stage of gold and silver pour, today they no longer exist as the companies that funded them to there assets. This is happening a lot.

when would the estimated 1st gold poor be.
Production from La India open pit is estimated to be between 80,000 to 100,000 oz gold per annum.

When I watch the proactive video and to here we was very close in being profitable at corporate level and to here with Stanley it is still profitable at these oil prices this clearly shows the margins being made with Stanley.

If the board was more up front with the costing and more investors could see how low costs Stanley is this could have created more interest.

I now see why Stanley is the main target to focus on and the more of these wells to be drilled then the better.

Stanley is still cashflow positive so we do not have a worry there with the current oil price.

If the other assets are not cash flow positive then put it on maintenance until price of oil improves and focus on Stanley.

There RNS never comes across like great news but all in all for Mosmans to continue on these wells must be very low cost, once S1 and S2 is fully in production after work over to know the bopd and if any chance they can work out the net average cost per barrel of oil. This will only give confident.

A workover has just been completed at Stanley-2 and an initial strong increase in oil flow was observed. The well will be returned to production in the next 48 hours.
The workover rig is now in the process of setting up at Stanley-1 to facilitate a workover at that well, with the objective of increasing production.

Lets hope with our low cost wells Mosmans starts to give us more detailed information, other small cap firms seems to be quite confident on there low cost wells.
Mosmans has been doing better i would say in terms of bringing money back in, what they lack so much on is there wordings on RNS's , always bringing it down and looking negative, they clearly need to start to connect with investors and stop blaming the negativity with some posts with bringing the share down.

Every thing cost money and other small cap firms are willing to pay to get there name out there, maybe Mosmans does not believe in this.

I really hope they can change, this still can be a very good share to have.

We are always the one that does not move up but down we are good at.

I am sure Spray will be back, richteex I take no fun when I see words of exchange on this forum go a bit 2 far. It is not one persons fault but all of our fault as we have the control within us hold not to go to far.

Like many others share holders we have seen a lot of disappointment, not with our assets as we have grown in production and have assets but with the lack of listening by Mosmans board and there wordings on the RNS’s.

A decade ago when oil dropped Mosmans did survive and that was with no oil production, we have money coming in and Stanley wells are low cost but how low we will not know as John seems to not advise, but in 2 weeks time we will know more.

I do hope Mosmans does pull though because people like me have invested a lot of money and to loose my funds would be very harsh no one should be happy to see a company go bust as it hurts a lot of people.

I get told it is a legal requirement to let share holders know, all the RNS did is put worry and hence why we have been knocked down, why not just work in the back ground and then give an update. If we have low cost wells and still to date we do not know our average cost per barrel of oil as it is to many variables to work out advised by the company but everyone else can.

An example from Reabold.
Reabold, the AIM investing company which focuses on investments in pre-cash flow upstream oil and gas projects, notes the following with respect to current volatile market conditions relating to COVID-19.



A fundamental aspect of the Reabold business model is to participate in projects which have low development and operating costs, thereby reducing sensitivity to the oil price. As announced on 26 February 2020, the cash operating costs of Reabold California are US$13 per barrel of oil equivalent, meaning production in California continues to be profitable and to generate positive free cash flow at current oil prices.



Reabold's expected work programme for 2020 is fully-funded by cash already invested into the operating businesses. The programme includes the testing of West Newton A-2, the drilling of two wells at West Newton B, the testing of IM-1 and the drilling of IM-2 in Romania, and the drilling of additional wells in California. We believe that these projects remain highly economic at current oil prices.

When we get good RNS no movement, we get a bad RNS we get 50% drop, why give an RNS like this everyone is struggling others have not done this.

It just seems like they want the shares to drop.

Da_Gee I get the same, I spoke to a guy that ran and oil and gas company in Canada and he told me any company should know there break even, Mosman know it they just don’t want to advise what it is.

This is partly why our value has not increased for a decade, the board has done well with getting new prospects but they can not connect with investors and don’t believe giving basic information would help.

Look at TLW there break even with one of there well is around $56 per barrel, they have high cost wells.

If we have low cost wells and the market knows the break even it would be great for us.

In times like this Mosmans needs to reassure investors, especially with price of oil dropping.

Does anyone know the break even point for the wells we have. Stanley clearly is low cost it would be nice to know the information it also could bring on more investors.

I just don’t get why they have an issue with giving this information.

If anyone emails John and they feel they can get through to him then please do as I don’t get much back.

The cost per barrel is what I have asked the board to advise and I get told there is many variables so to date we still do not know.

This will now test Mosmans as they seem to always with hold information that could bring investors on board.

If our costs are so low on Stanley why would you not want the market to know that is a positive.

Oil is down in price, Mosman’s will now use this as the reason the share price is not going up.

We have low cost wells and if the board starts to realise the importance of advising the market what the break even is on each Stanley well this could be an opportunity to connect to investors at these prices and if oil goes lower we will be making money.

The board has not connected with people and do not see how important it is and they need to start changing and if they can’t then bring some one on board that will.