Member Info for NGR1616

Banter;-)

The current daily volumes are minuscule compared to pre trial and immediately post trial volumes. Goes to show just how much was driven by litigation and not organic business as I suspect all that got invested for one have left the rest of us to wait for the other to take off imminently……

Potentially

The question was specifically about phones. Yes you could extrapolate that across all devices but similarly he said you need to understand SWIR and it’s benefits beyond 940 to identify a use to replace silicon.

I’m just guessing that Apple understands SWIR and it’s benefits in developing it’s (until this week) secret Pro-Vison device that needs SWIR in ways handhelds don’t.

It would be unwise to hint at an earlier use in a device other than a handheld publicly when you are developing (potentially) a use with Apple Id think 🤔

Nice try indeed.

Nanostory can you share a link to Steckle’s statement for context in this regard? Thanks 🙏

I guess your crew would have more influence on the upstream supply chain and immediately cease delays in the end product development and launch and/or also change the tech? Impressive.

That’s what you are saying yeah?

Other stocks to watch

"Investors will also be watching the wide variety of stocks worldwide that fall into the massive orbit of Apple's supplier ecosystem, especially after the tech giant announced one of its most ambitious hardware projects ever.

That includes some key chipmakers, including TSMC

TSM and Samsung Electronics (OTCPK:SSNLF). STMicroelectronics

STM is a good bet to watch: It's already an Apple supplier (making power management chips for the iPhone) with capabilities in augmented reality/virtual reality"

*integral

The sensors are clearly intergral to this tech. TOF and IR linked to the processor make the magic happen.

The current board is not the same board as that in place for Dow and all the other “missed projections” you elude to now are they?

It wasn’t the same one running the CO when what was suggested to be Apple pulled out in 2019. In fact I’m struggling to recall what other projections have been missed…….

Is reporting that you are working with a company hoping to get them to adopt technology a failure? Or is reporting that you’re working with more companies to test the tech in the hope they adopt a failure?

Then only projections being made are for commercial orders in this year which we are not half way through or your attempts to destabilise the company and break it up.

He wants to sell the s-hole non productive factory nanoco lease

It's not a spoof as such but it's not the transcript either. It's written by people familiar with these events - Apple launch events in particular and Apple's technology development pipeline and pulling together leaks and rumours. Some of it will be on the money and some of it will miss in my opinion.

Doesn't mean we won't get something positive from it however. But we also might not. Maybe.

From Quantum Leaper or ADVFN

« Nanoco is not Ericcson, Qualcomm or Nokia. It is a tiny company that had been on the brink of insolvency for years. To compare it to giants just goes to show his out of touch you are with the reality of litigation.

And the Kaist matter lasted seven years.

I’m sorry but if you think Nanoco cheated you by settling then you have not understood litigation risk or the time value of money, as was apparent from all the pre-settlement ramping »

(Of course I now expect to have this content ignored and instead see various claims about dual identities and that I’m being overly supportive of the board etc)

This is all pretty desperate stuff. Sad that someone is so aggrieved they need to resort to these measures.

Kooba….you’re really not worth replying to. But if you think not wanting to oust the board and disrupt the supply chain with a group who wants to sell Runcorn makes me display unreserved support then so be it! I have zero connection to anyone on here or the board.

I see the penny has maybe finally begun to drop ;-)

I’m out in Malmaison in Aberdeen with my clients right now being wined and dined. I’m not going to reply other than to quote « you are likely connected to the company » suggesting you are indeed implying I’m paid »

Frankly Kooba I don’t really care what you think. If your fantasies conclude I’m a paid stooge that’s your prerogative.

I’m concerned about the plans to ‘sell off’ the company as published by Tariq Hamoodi.

He precisely misinterpreted words like could, possibly, potential, may etc

Nanostory is attempting to undermine the board. FACT.