Member Info for NGR1616

The only thing niggling me is the inane drivel you post.

Until the case is won and the money is in the bank it could never be accounted for.

A ‘win’ would have spiked the SP but because of the risks and protracted nature of appeals it would quickly be back to these sorts of levels in my opinion. Simply because those invested for the case would have sold hence cratering the SP. I doubt II’s would subscribe to more capital raises with this backdrop.

* some / live

Why not just make it $2bn if it’s that easy……honestly done people like in cloud cuckoo land.

“Should’ve gone to court……”

Yeah cos that would speed things up! 🙈

Of course they are. The merest thought they’re not says lots about those voicing them!

I’m just a shareholder dude! Unlike you, who’s a ****

Nanoco should buy Apple and force the technology to be adopted by the developers asap. Same with car manufacturers. Also defence contractors. They should use the money they got from Samsung, buy loads of TV’s then write terrible reviews in protest. Also an editorial in the Sun telling people they better buy so QD’s or else. And of course BT and CR should be sent to the gaol to be HD&Q’d!!

Wishing doesn’t make it happen! You’re so out of your depth here.

Apple have been working on Vision Pro for over 10 years at least.

The SWIR market is still in relatively early stages of adoption. It’s been spoken about in publications for over 5 years.

The problem with people like you is your expectations exceed reality.

You consider you can do a better job stimulating the supply chain?

" I would have expected by now multiple product streams with multiple customers in case one fails or faces delays you still have others in the pipeline...placing all your eggs on one basket is target fool hardy and mirrors the mistake made with Apple Inc in the past"

Just shows how much of a deluded muppet you are....

It's a completely fair comparison to make. The US justice system doesn't differ dramatically state to state.

Oh and re Netlist.....https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/samsung-files-new-lawsuit-against-netlist-computer-memory-patent-fight-2023-10-11/

Yeah CFQD's will save the planet embedded in a hunk of plastic and thousands of other components. You're here to get rich. And you think it should have happened already with a massive award in court. But if that was won you think the share price would have reflected it? No.

Burford recently 'won' in a case worth $16bn in damages from the Argentinian govt. They are entitled to a share in the region of $5bn before deducting legal costs. The Argentinians are as expected appealing and that could take time to resolve all the while adding legal costs (albeit with accrued interest too).

The SP spiked in a not too dissimilar fashion to Nanoco on the initial news. Where is it now? Back to where it was pre-trial. I suspect the same would be true in Nanoco's case except they don't have the financial clout of BUR who's business model is litigation finance not QD design.

And now that you are not being fed daily the news you want you continue to lose faith in the board who I'm sure are waiting for news just like us. They can't falsely report orders (see WANDisco) , are at the mercy of the supply chain for emerging technology adoption and you still blame the board because they gave you an indication that the future looked promising.

I really wish they'd said it was dead with no prospects so you'd sell out and moan somewhere else. But that would make them liars.

Henry…..Nanoco make those things that the Nobel Prize in chemistry was awarded to…..that thing that is likely to become ubiquitous in lots of consumer products in years to come.

Fact is your timeline is too condensed.

Please explain why you expect something to appear magically in the results that hasn’t already been disclosed ? And why you believe it was the “worst settlement you could have imagined”…..

I could imagine losing, winning with appeals taking years and a disappointing award by jury, lots of legal costs, interest of debt, the need to raise money in an increasingly volatile lending market, non validation of IP and potentially disruptive narratives putting off customers and or investors for the years to come as the legal wrangling continued as being worse than securing $150m now.

BT made you no promises. That is where you are continuing to make misjudgements.

All my Caps were removed for some reason 🤷🏼‍♂️

take the settlement out of the equation and is nanoco any different to before? it’s an investment in new technology as yet un-adopted. we waited and were intimately thwarted on display (settlement aside). same with ‘apple’ and here we are again on the cusp.

the question isn’t so much do you believe in bt it’s for me; do i believe in stm’s ability to sell their swir products. do i believe yole research about cagr predictions about swir adoption and if nanoco is the best company from a technology perspective to capitalise. in all cases the answer is yes.

i believe bt isn’t the best ceo we could have but in the absence of other options he’ll do for me just now. maybe in time he’ll prove he is the best….or not.

i’m just waiting for now. re validation i suspect the materials have achieved the requirements, perhaps nanoco think they can exceed or stm have asked them to exceed what’s already delivered for testing. it’s still an early development project in relative terms and improvements are likely possible as they finesse. as for rns announcements as discussed on the other board i can see arguments for and against. it’s a bit of a ******* contest and only time will tell who’s got it right.

Had he not exercised his right to an equitable tax solution he’d be pilloried by the same muppets here for not doing so.

“ Brian Tenner, CEO, and Nigel Pickett, CTO, have both exercised their respective awards and utilised the cash proceeds of selling a proportion of shares to fund their personal tax obligations and dealing fees, while retaining the balance in full thereby increasing their shareholdings by 551,946 shares and 498,336 shares respectively.”

So you think it will drop to 4p and stay there? With cash on the balance sheet? And orders potentially confirmed?

Clowns to the left...